Remote-work limit long-overdue step
Last week, the Biden administration introduced new measures to scale back remote work at federal agencies, a long-overdue step that will hopefully help restore public transparency, a more efficient functioning of government and the vibrancy of downtown Washington. In his State of the Union address, President Biden promised that “the vast majority of federal workers will once again work in person.” But ever since, it has been unclear when any concrete steps would be taken, especially given that there has been so little consistency across government agencies when it comes to remote-work policies. The administration’s new guidelines emphasize “organizational health and organizational performance” and rightly call on agency workforces “to increase meaningful in-person work.” Best of all, these guidelines urge respective government agencies to submit work plans to the Office of Management and Budget that describe their current telework policies as well as their implementation plans for a return to the office.
For months, the federal government has described the coronavirus as “endemic,” signifying that the deadly virus remains a serious risk but is now a known commodity, no longer the unprecedented emergency of previous years. So, it is ironic that a large percentage of federal workers still haven’t returned to the office, when many of their private sector counterparts have. According to a recent Post-Schar School poll, nearly half of Washington workers say they have jobs that can be done remotely all or some of the time. But of those, 80% of federal workers polled who are capable of working from home say they would like to continue working remotely all or most of the time. (That compares with 33% of nonfederal workers.) About 60% said they would like to be completely remote. That is unsustainable, and it has had a palpable impact on the city of Washington. Stroll through downtown these days, and the city’s grand avenues and stately facades seem attached to a ghost town, a shell of the lively center the area was before the pandemic. For-lease signs abound; glass towers sit empty. That’s largely because many federal employees are still working from home, and they account for about one-quarter of jobs downtown.
In January, Washington’s Democratic mayor, Muriel E. Bowser, smarting from a downturn in tax revenue, used her third inaugural address to call for the Biden administration to use “decisive action” to bring “most federal workers back to the office most of the time.” Ms. Bowser is justified in raising the issue: At the very least, the federal government owes the city some clarity on occupancy of downtown buildings, so that municipal authorities can decide how best to proceed. Republicans have also been focusing on this issue, going so far as to introduce in January a bill called the “Stopping Home Office Work’s Unproductive Problem” Act, or “Show Up” Act. Show Up passed in the House but is unlikely to pass in the Senate.
Granted, the issue is much more complex than partisan politics. Despite the claims of traditional managers who insist on a full return to five days in the office, the truth is that U.S. productivity actually spiked in the second half of 2020 while most offices were shut. And it fell sharply in the first quarters of 2022, when most companies began mandating a return to the office. The administration’s new guidelines rightly take stock of this issue: “Planning should recognize that some operating units have improved performance while using workplace flexibilities,” they note.
To that end, federal workers need not work in the office five days per week; like other employees, including those of The Post, they should be entitled to work on a hybrid schedule that mandates a certain number of days in the office. And, indeed, the new guidelines allow for the continued existence of “flexible operational policies” at government agencies. Compromise here is key. Federal workers, like other office workers across the country, are entitled to flexible work schedules. But for the sake of the city, as well as the taxpayers who have had to keep commuting to their jobs, even during the uptick in omicron infections this past winter, they should not be entitled to work remotely indefinitely.