Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Inspector general report finds IRS security still lax

Contractor access to sensitive systems noted

- FATIMA HUSSEIN Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Lindsay Whitehurst of The Associated Press.

WASHINGTON — A new IRS inspector general report said the nation’s tax collection agency continued to give 19 contractor­s access to sensitive systems despite having background reports that were returned as “not favorable.”

Despite having the unfavorabl­e rating returned as recently as July 13, 2023, “These contractor­s still retained their access to one or more sensitive systems because the IRS did not take action to suspend or disable the contractor­s from the IRS’s systems, as required,” according to a report issued this week by the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administra­tion.

IRS Commission­er Daniel Werfel — who took over the agency last April — told The Associated Press that four of the contractor­s have since been terminated and the others have resubmitte­d their paperwork and received favorable background checks, adding that “there’s no implicit implicatio­n of any kind,” he said, “that these 19 contractor­s compromise­d taxpayer informatio­n in any way.”

An IRS spokespers­on said due to privacy issues they could not provide specific dates for when the concerns were flagged, but said they were “promptly resolved” when identified by TIGTA.

The report comes as access to sensitive taxpayer informatio­n has sparked calls for investigat­ions — and calls for reform on taxes for the wealthy.

Last month, former IRS contractor Charles Edward Littlejohn of Washington, D.C., was sentenced to five years in prison after pleading guilty to leaking tax informatio­n about former President Donald Trump and thousands of the country’s wealthiest people to news outlets.

Littlejohn, 38, gave data to The New York Times and ProPublica between 2018 and 2020 in leaks that appeared to be “unparallel­ed in the IRS’s history,” prosecutor­s said.

Littlejohn had applied to work as a contractor to get Trump’s tax returns and carefully figured out how to search and extract tax data to avoid triggering suspicions internally, prosecutor­s said in court documents.

In February 2023, Missouri Rep. Jason Smith, the Republican chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, sent a letter to TIGTA asking for a review of the leak. Smith’s office did not immediatel­y respond to an Associated Press request for comment on the report.

Werfel is set to testify in front of the House Ways and Means Committee on Feb. 15.

In addition, the inspector general report outlined a slew of insufficie­ncies in IRS security, stating that it “has repeatedly reported that a key deficiency in the IRS’s detection and deterrence processes is not ensuring that all sensitive systems are providing complete, accurate, and usable audit trail logs for monitoring and identifyin­g unauthoriz­ed access and for other investigat­ive purposes.”

Since 2002, TIGTA has issued seven reports that detail the IRS’s audit trail deficienci­es, with the most recent report being issued in October 2023, the report states.

Werfel said that since the agency has received funding through Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, it has been able to markedly improve the security of sensitive informatio­n, including audit trail deficienci­es.

“Our data security and environmen­t is dramatical­ly better today than it was in 2017 to 2020 when this unauthoriz­ed access occurred,” Werfel said. “And it’s dramatical­ly better today because we now have the resources to make the right investment­s to strengthen our data security. And we have made dramatic changes.”

The report also states there were certain scenarios in which a terminated contractor could still have access, but Werfel said that “once a contractor no longer works for the IRS, they have no access to our network and therefore no access to sensitive data.”

“The fact remains,” the report says, “for some sensitive systems, the IRS does not have adequate controls to detect or prevent the unauthoriz­ed removal of data by users.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States