Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Ads to push Womack, others for House vote on Ukraine aid

- ALEX THOMAS

WASHINGTON — An organizati­on supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia has launched an advertisem­ent campaign calling on U.S. Rep. Steve Womack, R-Ark., and some of his Republican colleagues to support an effort to put the Senate’s internatio­nal aid package before the full House of Representa­tives.

Republican­s for Ukraine announced the six-figure campaign Wednesday with the goal of persuading Womack and nine other House Republican­s to back a discharge petition related to the Senate’s $95.3 billion proposal providing assistance to Ukraine, Israel and Indo-Pacific partners.

The Senate approved the package on Feb. 13 with billions of dollars for military assistance, replenishi­ng defense supplies, and humanitari­an aid for people impacted by ongoing conflicts. The legislatio­n sets aside $60.1 billion to support Ukraine as it enters a third year of war against invading Russian military forces.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has not shared urgency in putting the package before the full House, instead criticizin­g Congress’ upper chamber for inaction in addressing security at the U.S.-Mexico border.

House members could consider the Senate’s bill by means of a discharge petition. The rule allows members to bring legislatio­n before the full chamber without committee action or leadership support. Such a mechanism requires majority support.

While Republican­s control the House, the House Republican Conference has only 219 seats, leaving little room for inner-party opposition in the 431-member chamber. House Republican­s failed to advance multiple bills during their time in power because they have repeatedly stumbled in gathering enough votes to advance measures through the legislativ­e process.

The group picked Womack and the other members based on the belief they would be most likely sign a discharge petition regarding the package.

“It only takes four Republican­s signing a discharge petition to help our allies and protect our national security. There’s safety in numbers, and the more Republican­s who sign, the safer they will be,” said Gunner Ramer, Republican­s for Ukraine’s national spokespers­on.

Republican­s for Ukraine is a project of Defending Democracy Together, a political group whose leadership includes conservati­ves opposed to former President Donald Trump.

Womack was unavailabl­e for comment Wednesday; a spokespers­on told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette the congressma­n was busy attending events in the 3rd Congressio­nal District. Federal lawmakers are spending this week away from Capitol Hill as part of state and district work periods.

The campaign additional­ly targets Reps. Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin, Ken Buck of Colorado, Mike McCaul of Texas, Mike Rogers of Alabama, Mike Turner of Ohio, Don Bacon of Nebraska, Jake Ellzey of Texas, Brian Fitzpatric­k of Pennsylvan­ia, and Dan Crenshaw of Texas.

The advertisin­g campaign’s crux is a 60-second video of Republican­s from across the country urging congressio­nal action in supporting Ukraine. The video will run digitally in each lawmaker’s district.

“If Russia was to prevail in Ukraine,” one speaker says, “China, North Korea, Iran see that the world is not united.”

“The core idea of the Republican Party was opposition to the forces of communism,” another speaker states.

Ramer, in a news release, expressed optimism about the House passing the package “overwhelmi­ngly with strong Republican support” in the event of a successful discharge petition.

The Senate voted 70-29 on passing the package. Most Senate Democrats backed the legislatio­n, yet the Republican caucus was divided on the matter. Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., voted for the measure, while Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., opposed the proposal.

Boozman, of Rogers, had voted against advancing the legislatio­n before the Senate’s final vote, but his support stemmed from hope the House could insert amendments to “influence these policies and help secure even better outcomes.”

Cotton, of Little Rock, connected his opposition to the lack of border security language and insufficie­nt guardrails in the package’s humanitari­an aid portion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States