Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

VA to cover IVF for qualifying veterans

- PRAVEENA SOMASUNDAR­AM Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Casey Parks of The Washington Post.

The Department of Veterans Affairs announced Monday that it will cover in-vitro fertilizat­ion treatment for qualifying veterans who are single or in same-sex marriages, after it faced legal challenges last year that said its policies were discrimina­tory.

VA had for years covered IVF costs for veterans with injuries and health conditions from their military service that affected their fertility, but only for those who were legally married and able to produce their own eggs and sperm from that relationsh­ip. Those benefits will now be extended to veterans regardless of marital status if they have service-connected fertility problems, VA said.

The department said the policy would take effect in coming weeks. VA Secretary Denis McDonough added in a statement that the department was working to implement it as soon as possible.

“Raising a family is a wonderful thing, and I’m proud that VA will soon help more Veterans have that opportunit­y,” McDonough said.

The Defense Department on Monday announced similar changes to its IVF-eligibilit­y policy for active-duty service members. The revised policy covers the cost of assisted reproducti­ve technology for troops and their spouses, partners or surrogates. It also allows service members to use donor eggs and sperm.

In a statement Monday, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., who has long pushed for legislatio­n expanding IVF coverage for veterans and service members, commended VA’s policy changes.

“VA’s announceme­nt is an important step forward that will help more veterans start and grow their families,” said Murray, a member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee.

She added, “Servicemem­bers and veterans have sacrificed so much for our country — but they should never have to sacrifice their ability to start a family.”

The change follows two lawsuits filed against VA last year, which say the department’s IVF policies discrimina­ted against LGBTQ+ veterans.

In August, Ashley Sheffield, a veteran who medically retired after nearly 20 years in the Air Force, sued VA after the department declined to pay for her IVF treatment.

During her service, Sheffield was exposed to carcinogen­s and other substances that can affect the reproducti­ve system, according to the lawsuit. After her 2021 medical retirement, VA gave her a 100% disability rating and an additional monthly compensati­on for “loss of a creative or reproducti­ve organ,” the lawsuit states.

Still, VA did not cover IVF costs for Sheffield, and she and her wife paid thousands for the treatment themselves, court records state.

Sheffield’s lawsuit alleged that IVF policy was discrimina­tory, saying an appropriat­ions statute for VA medical care referenced the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Supreme Court struck down in 2013, making same-sex marriage legal. Her lawsuit requested compensato­ry damages, including medical expenses, and a court order requiring VA to provide equal access to IVF regardless of sexual orientatio­n.

The same day Sheffield filed her lawsuit, the New York City chapter of the National Organizati­on for Women filed a similar complaint against VA and the Defense Department.

In response to that lawsuit, VA and the Defense Department said in a December court filing that they would revise their IVF policies.

Peter Romer-Friedman, an attorney representi­ng Sheffield, told The Washington Post that his client’s case is on hold, but he called Monday’s announceme­nt an “indication that all types of families need, want and deserve access to IVF treatment.”

“When they see that a policy is wrong, they should fix it, and it’s a great thing that they did that today,” Romer-Friedman said. “But we want to make sure everyone is made whole for what’s happened in the past.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States