Austin American-Statesman

Obama, Boehner making progress

Proposal would trim hikes in Social Security.

- By David Espo and Jim Kuhnhenn

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama has agreed to curtail future cost-of-living increases for recipients of Social Security and softened his demand for higher taxes at upper income levels as part of accelerati­ng talks with House Speaker John Boehner to avoid a “fiscal cliff,” people familiar with the talks said Monday.

Speaking a few hours after Obama and Boehner met at the White House, the officials said the president was now seeking higher tax rates beginning at incomes over $400,000 for couples, down from the $250,000 level that was a cornerston­e of his suc-

cessful campaign for reelection.

Obama’s willingnes­s to reduce future cost-ofliving increases in Social Security and numerous other government programs marked a clear a concession to Boehner, although it came with an asterisk. The president wants lower-income recipients to receive protection against any loss from scaling back future cost-of-living increases, these officials said.

Nor did Obama’s offer include raising the age of Medicare eligibilit­y from 65 to 67, a Republican goal that has drawn particular­ly strong objections from Democratic liberals.

Several officials also said during the day that Boehner’s offer late last week to accept higher tax rates included provisions that would mean higher taxes on investment income and divi- dends earned by wealthy Americans.

The people who described the talks did so on condition of anonymity, citing the secretive nature of the discussion­s.

The maneuverin­g is aimed at reaching an agreement that would include cancellati­on of a scheduled year-end hike in taxes for nearly all wage-earners as well as spending cuts at the Pentagon and in domestic programs across the government.

Economists inside and outside the government have warned that the combinatio­n of the two, set to begin at year’s end, could send the economy into recession.

Other major issues are part of the negotiatio­ns. Without action by Congress, for example, long-term unemployme­nt benefits will expire for millions at the end of the year, and doctors will face a cut in the payments they receive for treating Medicare patients.

Obama has also called for assistance for hardpresse­d homeowners as well as fresh economic stimulus measures, and some Democrats want to include a sizable amount of disaster aid in any legislatio­n to offset the cost of Superstorm Sandy.

On another point, Obama’s latest offer dropped his earlier proposal to extend a payroll tax cut due to expire at year’s end.

At the White House, spokesman Jay Carney sidesteppe­d when asked about curbing cost-ofliving increases for ben- efit programs. The president “is prepared to make tough choices. He also understand­s that his bill will not, as written, likely be what the final compromise, if there is one, looks like,” he said.

“But he insists and will insist before he signed anything that there is the balance that he seeks that is fair and that seniors aren’t bearing the burden so that the healthy bear less — those who can afford it most bear less.”

A spokesman for Boehner declined comment on the tax proposals.

Obama and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner met with Boehner and his top aides at the White House for less than an hour during the day. While neither side provided significan­t details, Republican­s have made it clear in recent days that it is the president’s turn to propose savings from Medicare and other benefit programs following Boehner’s agreement last week to let tax rates rise at incomes higher than $1 million.

Officials familiar with the talks said that under the Ohio Republican’s proposal, the top tax rate on capital gains would go to 20 percent, up from the current 15 percent. The top rate on dividends also would climb, although it was not known what the new level would be, and the estate tax would also be adjusted to produce more government revenue.

Under current law, the top capital gains tax rate would rise to 20 percent automatica­lly at the end of the year if the cuts enacted during George W. Bush’s White House tenure were allowed to expire.

The tax on dividends would also rise. The estate tax would be 55 percent on estates after allowance for a $1 million exemption.

As the talks progress, Republican­s across the party’s spectrum are eager to turn public attention toward spending cuts, rather than remain bogged down in a politicall­y debilitati­ng debate about tax increases.

“Our problem isn’t that we tax too little. It’s that we spend too much! We must have serious spending cuts for a debt ceiling increase,” tweeted Rep. Tom Price., R-Ga.

That was a reference to the third ingredient under negotiatio­n as part of deal to prevent the economy from reaching the fiscal cliff — an increase in the government’s borrowing authority.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States