Austin American-Statesman

Climate control:

- By Matthew Daly

The Republican-controlled House votes to block Obama’s plan to limit carbon pollution from new power plants.

WASHINGTON — Aiming at the heart of President Barack Obama’s strategy for fighting climate change, the Republican-controlled House voted Thursday to block the administra­tion’s plan to limit carbon pollution from new power plants.

The bill targets Obama’s proposal for the Environmen­tal Protection Agency to set the first national limits on heat-trapping carbon pollution from future power plants. It’s part of the GOP’s election-year strategy to fight back against what Republican­s call a “war on coal” by the Obama administra­tion.

The bill passed by a 229-183 vote. Ten Democrats, mostly from coal-producing states or the South, joined Republican­s in support of it. Three Republican­s opposed the bill.

A similar measure is pending in the Senate.

“The Obama administra­tion clearly wants to use its regulatory agenda to

end coal- fifired power generation in this country, but that is a pipe dream,” said Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, noting that coal provides nearly 40 percent of

the nation’s electricit­y. Rep. Ed Whitfifiel­d, R-Ky., called the EPA proposal “one of the most extreme regulation­s of the Obama administra­tion. He said the proposed limits on carbon emissions would “make it impossible to build a new coal- fifired power plant in America.”

No new coal plants are currently being considered because of competitio­n from cheap natu- ral gas. But Whitfifiel­d and other Republican­s argue that could change if natural gas prices keep rising. In that case, utili

ty companies should be able to “go out and build a coal-powered plant with reasonable regulation­s,”

said Whitfifiel­d, who chairs the House subcommitt­ee on energy and power.

The Whitfield-sponsored House bill requires EPA to set carbon emissions standards based on technology that has been in use for at least a year. Republican­s and some coal-state Democrats say

the EPA rule is based on carbon-capturing technology that doesn’t currently exist.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., denounced the legislatio­n as “a science-denial bill” that would strip the EPA of its ability to block carbon

pollution. He and other Democrats called the bill a blatant attempt to thwart the EPA and vilify the Obama administra­tion in an election year.

The White House has threatened to veto, saying the bill would “undermine public health protection­s of the Clean Air Act and stop U.S. progress in cutting dangerous carbon pollution from power plants.” Power plants account for about one-third of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming.

EPA Administra­tor Gina McCarthy and other officials have said the proposed rule is based on carbon reduction methods that are “technicall­y feasible” and under developmen­t in at least four sites.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States