Austin American-Statesman

Cruz and Rubio vying for conservati­ve vote

Texas senator focuses on far right; Fla. senator seeks wider coalition.

- Jonathan Martin and Patrick Healy ©2015 The New York Times

After a Republican presidenti­al debate in which sober policy discussion­s edged out the loud personalit­y clashes that have dominated so far, the campaign’s focus narrowed Wednesday into a battle for the party’s most conservati­ve voters.

That fight, which could be the most decisive but unpredicta­ble element of the nomination contest, increasing­ly appeared to be head- ing toward a confrontat­ion between two first-term senators who were both elected with tea party support but who have since taken different paths: Ted Cruz of Texas and

Marco Rubio of Florida.

Each made his pitch in subtle but unmistakab­le ways during the debate and afterward, as they left Milwaukee for a day of campaignin­g across the country.

The most glaring difference between the two that surfaced during the debate was over the issue of immigratio­n policy. Cruz tried to portray Rubio as a moderate beholden to the Republican establishm­ent, while Rubio argued that his approach was the most reasonable and workable conservati­ve solution.

“I think for voters that are looking for someone who’s consistent and true, I’m the only one on that stage who’s always opposed amnesty,” Cruz said in an interview on Fox News after the debate, underlinin­g his opposition to the bipartisan immigratio­n bill that Rubio helped write in the Senate.

After avoiding the immigratio­n issue Tuesday night, Rubio addressed it in an interview Wednesday, telling Fox News that he understood why the immigratio­n proposal — which has cost him support on the right — was the wrong approach.

“The lesson I learned from that is the people of the United States do not trust the federal government on immigratio­n,” Rubio said as he listed a set of policies he said would “realistica­lly but responsibl­y” address the problem.

“If you’re a criminal, you’ll be deported,” he said. “If you’re not a criminal, and have been here longer than 10 years, you have to learn English. You have to start paying taxes. You’re going to have to pay a fine. And then you’ll get a work permit.”

He did not mention the question that enrages so many conservati­ve voters: whether to eventually grant citizenshi­p to immigrants in the country illegally, though he acknowledg­ed on NPR that those who earn so-called green cards would eventually be able to apply for citizenshi­p.

The difficulty Rubio faces on immigratio­n — trying not to alienate voters on the right while not appearing unreasonab­le to the voters he hopes will support him in a general election — was evident Wednesday morning in an appearance on CBS News. He was pressed on whether the United States should deport people shielded under the executive action President Barack Obama took last year. That step, which gave nearly 5 million undocument­ed immigrants a reprieve, is being challenged in court and could fall.

“We need to enforce our law,” Rubio said when asked whether he would favor deporting them.

Rubio flew later Wednesday to Iowa, where several hundred people came to hear him speak at a restaurant in Davenport. His state campaign chairman, Jack Whitver, told the crowd that the debates were helping Rubio steadily expand his following.

Cruz planned to attend a gathering with veterans in New Hampshire.

Both men are essentiall­y fighting over a pool of voters that neither can lay claim to at the moment: higher-educated and more religious conservati­ves who are now mostly supporting Ben Carson, the retired pediatric neurosurge­on who largely failed to distinguis­h himself Tuesday on a stage full of candidates who were far more fluent in domestic and foreign policy.

Carson and Donald Trump lead the GOP field in the most recent national polls, with Rubio and Cruz following them.

While Cruz and Rubio have similar, reliably conservati­ve, voting records (Cruz has a 100 percent rating from Heritage Action for America; Rubio earned 93 percent), they could not be more different in the way they have positioned themselves. Cruz sees his path to the nomination coming by solidifyin­g the support of the far right. Rubio aims to build a broader Republican coalition while recognizin­g that he cannot afford to appear too moderate and risk alienating the party’s core voters.

Cruz knows his path to the nomination will be less encumbered with Rubio wounded, and he tried to do so several times in the debate without mentioning his name.

In an exchange that probably went over many viewers’ heads, Cruz criticized a subsidy program for sugar producers that Rubio supports — a position that has earned the Florida senator scorn recently from fiscal conservati­ves.

Rubio, who did not address the issue in the debate, was asked about it on ABC’s “Good Morning America” and said he would continue to back the subsides until other countries got rid of their similar support.

“I want us to be able to compete with other countries,” he said. “But it has to be fair. They already have huge advantages. They don’t have an EPA, they don’t have labor unions in those countries.”

 ?? SCOTT OLSON / GETTY IMAGES ?? Presidenti­al candidates Ben Carson (left) and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speak Tuesday after the Republican presidenti­al debate in Milwaukee. At the debate, Cruz criticized a sugar subsidy program that Sen. Marco Rubio supports.
SCOTT OLSON / GETTY IMAGES Presidenti­al candidates Ben Carson (left) and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speak Tuesday after the Republican presidenti­al debate in Milwaukee. At the debate, Cruz criticized a sugar subsidy program that Sen. Marco Rubio supports.
 ??  ?? U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio’s challenge is not to appear too moderate.
U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio’s challenge is not to appear too moderate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States