Austin American-Statesman

White House dismisses threat

- Mark Landler, Choe Sang Hun and Jane Perlez

The White House brushed aside threats by North Korea on Wednesday to cancel an upcoming summit meeting between President Donald Trump and the North’s leader, Kim Jong Un.

The White House brushed aside threats by North Korea on Wednesday to cancel an upcoming summit meeting between President Donald Trump and the North’s leader, Kim Jong Un, saying it was still “hopeful” the meeting will happen

but that Trump would be fine if it did not.

“The president is ready if the meeting takes place,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told Fox News on Wednesday. “And if it doesn’t, we will continue the maximum pressure campaign that has been ongoing.”

White House officials said they were taking North Korea’s latest warnings in stride, in part because Kim, not Trump, had sought the meeting. They said they expected the North to maneuver for tactical advantage in the run-up to the meeting, which is scheduled for June 12 in Singapore.

When Trump was asked Wednesday about the prospects for the summit to go off as planned, he was noncommitt­al, telling reporters in the Oval Office, “We’ll have to see.” Trump said he would still insist on the denucleari­zation of the Korean Peninsula in the talks.

In its warning Wednesday, North Korea said Kim could withdraw from the meeting over Washington’s demand that it unilateral­ly abandon its nuclear arsenal.

The sudden change came after months in which Kim presented himself as a statesman, changing his image from tyrant to moderate on the world stage. By issuing the latest threat, the North reverted to his earlier hard-line stance on retaining nuclear weapons and to a North Korean playbook that includes sudden shifts in tactics when negotiatin­g with other nations.

But U.S. officials acknowledg­ed that the North appeared to be seeking to exploit a gap in the administra­tion’s messages about North Korea — between the hard-line views of national security adviser John Bolton and the more conciliato­ry tone of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has met twice with Kim in Pyongyang to lay the groundwork for the summit.

In a recent television interview, Bolton said the precedent for the North Korea negotiatio­ns should be Libya, which agreed to box up its entire nuclear program and ship it out of the country. Bolton said North Korea should receive no benefits, including the lifting of sanctions, until it had surrendere­d its entire nuclear infrastruc­ture.

Pompeo, by contrast, put the emphasis on the U.S. investment that would flow into North Korea if it agreed to relinquish its nuclear arsenal. He, too, said that the North would have to agree to “complete, verifiable, irreversib­le denucleari­zation,” the technical shorthand used by the administra­tion to describe its bargaining position with Pyongyang.

The president has shifted between a hard-line and more conciliato­ry tone in his statements about the North, although in recent days he has expressed excitement about a potential breakthrou­gh with Kim. He has not yet responded to the warning Wednesday issued by the North’s first vice foreign minister, Kim Kye Gwan, which took direct aim at Bolton.

Assessing the North’s recent statements, Koh Yu-hwan, a professor of North Korean studies at Dongguk University in Seoul, South Korea, said North Korea had begun to fear looking weak by taking unilateral steps, like its moratorium on missile tests. He noted that the United States, rather than offering concession­s of its own, has vowed to keep up its maximum pressure on the North if it fails to quickly denucleari­ze.

“The last thing Kim Jong Un can afford is to look like he is surrenderi­ng his nuclear weapons,” Koh said.

If North Korea’s tough statements Wednesday caught officials in Seoul and Washington off guard, they also reflected a well-establishe­d North Korean stance, with Kim saying his country wants to enter talks with the United States as an equal nuclear power.

Few analysts said North Korea would ultimately go so far as to cancel the Singapore meeting. Rather, the threat to withdraw was an attempt to raise the price that Washington would have to pay to get any significan­t concession­s on the North’s nuclear program, analysts said.

“The goal is to change the subject from what the U.S. wants to talk about — denucleari­zation — to Pyongyang’s preferred focus: U.S. military exercises, the U.S. ‘threat’ and by extension the U.S.-South Korea alliance,”

 ??  ??
 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? When President Donald Trump was asked about the prospects for the summit to go off as planned, he told reporters, “We’ll have to see.”
GETTY IMAGES When President Donald Trump was asked about the prospects for the summit to go off as planned, he told reporters, “We’ll have to see.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States