Google location data practices probed
At issue is whether Google gathers data even after opt-outs.
Google’s alleged practice of recording location data about Android device owners even when they believe they have opted out of such tracking has sparked an investigation in Arizona, where the state’s attorney general could potentially levy a hefty fine against the search giant.
The probe, initiated by Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich and confirmed by a person familiar with his thinking but not authorized to speak on the record, could put pressure on other states and the federal government to follow suit, consumer advocates say — though Google previously insisted it did not deceive consumers about the way it collects and taps data on their whereabouts.
The attorney general signaled his interest in the matter in a public filing that indicated the office had retained an outside law firm to assist in an investigation. The document, dated August 21, said the hired lawyers would help probe an unnamed tech company and its “storage of consumer location data, tracking of consumer location, and other consumer tracking through ... smartphone operating systems, even when consumers turn off ‘location services’ and take other steps to stop such tracking,” according to the heavily redacted public notice.
The document was dated just over a week after an investigation from the Associated Press found that Google devices and services store time-stamped location data even for users who believed they had turned off that data collection. The AP verified its findings with the help of researchers from Princeton University.
Ryan Anderson, a spokesman for the Arizona attorney general, acknowledged that there have been “recent bombshell reports depicting how the tech industry handles consumer data and what companies are doing with that information,” including the AP story, which “highlighted Google’s apparent tracking of consumer movement even if you opt out of such services.”
He added that Arizona had “been thinking about investigating privacy concerns by tech companies for some time,” including the tracking of consumer location and the gathering of consumer data. He said he couldn’t confirm which company it was targeting in its investigation.
Google spokesman Aaron Stein said in a statement that location data “helps us provide useful services when people interact with our products, like locally relevant search results and traffic predictions,” noting that it collects that information in many ways, including through Android devices as well as through search queries.
Previously, Google told the AP it provides “clear descriptions of these tools, and robust controls so people can turn them on or off, and delete their histories at any time.”
Under state law, Arizona can bring consumer-protection cases against businesses that deceive users about their practices. The state also can seek penalties of up to $10,000 per violation, meaning Google’s location privacy practices could result in a sky-high fine for the company.
Arizona’s investigation of Google marks Brnovich’s latest attempt to push tech giants to improve their online privacy practices. In March, he publicly blasted Facebook for its entanglement with Cambridge Analytica, a political consultancy that improperly accessed personal data about 87 million of the site’s users.