Austin American-Statesman

Nestle’s move from skin health revives L’Oreal sale talk

- By Thomas Mulier and Corinne Gretler Bloomberg News

Nestle’s likely retreat from skincare sharpens questions about the company’s broader involvemen­t in cosmetics and the future of a prized asset that many investors want to see sold: a $30 billion stake in L’Oreal.

Nestle said Thursday it would consider new owners for its dermatolog­ical business, a unit with $2.8 billion in annual revenue that Chief Executive Officer Mark Schneider said may no longer fit with the company’s overall strategy of focusing on products such as coffee, water and pet food.

That led analysts such as Andreas von Arx at Baader Helvea to speculate that a long-awaited divestment of L’Oreal may come up for discussion.

Schneider is stepping up the pace of change, having also announced a bond sale and the divestment of an insurance business in a flurry of deals this week. Breaking ties with the French cosmetics giant is one of the main remaining issues that activist investor Dan Loeb has been lobbying Nestle about.

“We see this as a symbol of willingnes­s to slay sacred cows,” wrote Martin Deboo of Jefferies. Schneider is making a “highly symbolic break” from his predecesso­rs.

Facing pressure from Loeb to focus on its mainstays, Nestle has bought and sold businesses at an accelerate­d pace in the past year. Selling the dermatolog­ical brands means dismantlin­g a business that former CEO Paul Bulcke touted as a promising new avenue of growth.

Analysts are divided on how much Nestle could get from the skin health unit. Deboo estimates 4 billion francs ($4.1 billion), saying the few plausible options include a sale to L’Oreal or a leveraged buyout. Alain Oberhuber, an analyst at MainFirst,

estimated it could fetch as much as 8 billion francs, as the business may appeal to Johnson & Johnson or Japan’s Shiseido Co.

Schneider has called Nestle’s stake in L’Oreal a “fabulous investment,” and has resisted calls to announce a divestment. The stock has gained 12 percent in the past year, outperform­ing Nestle’s shares.

Nestle Skin Health makes products ranging from acne treatments to injectable skin fillers that compete with Botox. The unit has been a weak spot for the company due to generic competitio­n, and is cutting hundreds of jobs and closing sites.

“One of the CEO’s top priorities at the beginning of his mandate was to stop the hemorrhagi­ng,” JeanPhilip­pe Bertschy, an analyst at Bank Vontobel AG, wrote in a note. The unit had engaged in “record value destructio­n in the past four years,” and now Nestle is “executing like a metronome.”

Nestle shares rose as much as 0.7 percent in early trading. They’re little changed from where they were before Loeb announced his stake in June last year.

The skincare business was built out of a joint venture called Galderma that Nestle formed with L’Oreal in 1981. Nestle paid the French cosmetics maker more than $3 billion to buy the business out in 2014 and in the following months paid a further $1.4 billion to buy a portfolio of skin-care drugs from Valeant Pharmaceut­icals.

 ?? STEFAN WERMUTH / BLOOMBERG ?? Nestle’s Skin Health unit has been a weak spot for the company due to generics.
STEFAN WERMUTH / BLOOMBERG Nestle’s Skin Health unit has been a weak spot for the company due to generics.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States