Austin American-Statesman

No, Texas doesn’t have the right to secede

- Sara Swann

Republican presidenti­al candidate Nikki Haley recently said she believes that states should have the right to do what their residents want to do — even if that means seceding from the United States.

In a Jan. 31 episode of “The Breakfast Club” radio show, host Charlamagn­e tha God asked Haley about Texas’ border dispute with the federal government and whether she still believes states have the right to secede, pointing to her previous remarks on the subject.

On the radio show, Haley acknowledg­ed that Texas is not going to secede, but said, “If Texas decides they want to do that, they can do that. … If that whole state says, ‘We don’t want to be part of America anymore,’ I mean, that’s their decision to make.”

Haley later walked back her comments in a Feb. 4 CNN interview, saying the U.S. Constituti­on doesn’t allow states to secede. Haley’s campaign did not answer PolitiFact’s request for comment.

“What I do think they have the right to do is have the power to protect themselves and do all that,” Haley said on CNN. “Texas has talked about seceding for a long time. The Constituti­on doesn’t allow for that. But what I will say is … where’s that coming from? That’s coming from the fact that people don’t think that (the) government is listening to them.”

For months, Texas and the federal government have been locked in a tense standoff over border security measures as record numbers of migrants illegally cross into the U.S. from Mexico. Meanwhile, social media has been awash with claims about Texas seceding and warnings of an impending civil war.

“Texas is about to become its own country to stop a civil war from occurring,” a Jan. 30 Instagram post claimed.

To address Haley’s initial comment and the internet buzz, we asked constituti­onal law experts whether a state could secede from the U.S. The consensus was a resounding “no.”

Experts said the Civil War tested and settled this question 159 years ago, and Haley’s radio show remarks ignored this significant part of American history. It wasn’t the first time Haley, a former South Carolina governor and United Nations ambassador, had misreprese­nted Civil War history.

The Constituti­on does not say anything explicitly for or against secession, experts said.

“But it’s pretty significant evidence that during the debates over ratification, when states were deciding whether or not to join this new union, no one said, ‘Well, if you don’t like it, you can always leave,’” said Kermit Roosevelt, a University of Pennsylvan­ia law professor.

Roosevelt said if Haley was making a moral or political argument, she could appeal to the Declaratio­n of Independen­ce as the 11 seceding southern states did at the time of the Civil War.

“But that’s not the Constituti­on, and the aspect of the Declaratio­n that we consider foundation­al to America now is more ‘all men are created equal’ than ‘it is the right of the people to alter or abolish’ their government,” Roosevelt said. “So Haley is offering a Confederat­e view of the Constituti­on that cost us over half a million lives.”

After the Civil War, in 1869, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Texas v. White that the U.S. is “an indestruct­ible union” and states do not have the right to unilateral­ly secede.

“When Texas became one of the United States, she entered into an indissolub­le relation,” the ruling stated. “There was no place for reconsider­ation or revocation, except through revolution or through consent of the States.”

The late conservati­ve Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia also weighed in on secession’s legality: “If there was any constituti­onal issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede,” Scalia wrote in a 2006 letter.

If Texas or another state wanted to secede and the state reached an agreement via Congress with the rest of the country, then it might work, said Brian Kalt, a Michigan State University law professor.

However, it’s more likely a secession attempt “would constitute an insurrecti­on against the United States that the central government would be entirely justified in suppressin­g by armed force, just as Lincoln did the Confederac­y,” said Frank Bowman, a University of Missouri law professor.

PolitiFact’s ruling

Haley said, “If that whole state says, ‘We don’t want to be part of America anymore,’ I mean, that’s their decision to make.”

Constituti­onal law experts told us the Civil War’s outcome and Supreme Court precedent say the opposite. We rate Haley’s claim False.

 ?? ?? Haley
Haley

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States