UT fires 60 who held DEI-related jobs
Sources detail layoffs in wake of Senate Bill 17
A week after state Sen. Brandon Creighton warned Texas university system administrators about the state’s expectations for higher education institutions to comply with Senate Bill 17 – an anti-DEI law that went into effect in January – the University of Texas has laid off at least 60 staff members who previously worked in diversity, equity and inclusion-related positions, according to three people with knowledge of the terminations.
UT has not confirmed to the American-Statesman the number of staff positions that have been eliminated or how many employees will be laid off, but on Tuesday afternoon, a person with knowledge of the terminations said at least 60 people have lost their jobs, 40 of them in the Division of Campus and Community Engagement alone. The layoffs are effective in 90 days or more, people familiar with the terminations told the Statesman. UT did not respond to a Statesman request for comment.
UT is also closing the Division of Campus and Community Engagement, previously known as the Division of Diversity and Community Engagement. President Jay Hartzell said in an email to the UT community on Tuesday afternoon, which was obtained by the Statesman, that though the school made changes before Jan. 1 to comply with SB 17, “we knew that more work would be required to utilize our talent and resources most effectively in support of our teaching and research
missions, and ultimately, our students.”
“The new law has changed the scope of some programs on campus, making them broader and creating duplication with long-standing existing programs supporting students, faculty, and staff,” Hartzell said. “Following those reviews, we have concluded that additional measures are necessary to reduce overlaps, streamline student-facing portfolios, and optimize and redirect resources into our fundamental activities of teaching and research.”
Hartzell said the remaining programs will be redistributed among other divisions. He said funding that previously supported DEI initiatives will not be redirected to “support teaching and research.” Student support, however, will be available for the rest of the semester.
“The positions that provided support for those associate and assistant deans and a small number of staff roles across campus that were formerly focused on DEI will no longer be funded,” Hartzell said.
Hartzell added in his email that the Division of Student Affairs will work to ensure student-facing support lasts through the rest of the semester as do student workers’ positions, and that “staff members whose positions are being eliminated will have the opportunity to apply and be considered for existing open positions at the University, and resources will be made available to support them.”
The university did not clarify how many or which programs and positions have been eliminated.
Why are changes influenced by SB 17 still being made?
SB 17 bans DEI offices, initiatives and employees from fulfilling those functions at Texas public universities and colleges. In Creighton’s March 26 letter to university system chancellors and boards of regents, he expressed disappointment that some colleges might just be changing office names and titles as part of their compliance, and he cautioned that “this letter should serve as notice that this practice is unacceptable.”
He warned administrators that lawmakers can take legal action and even freeze state funding for their institutions if they do not fully comply with SB
17. “Recognized as the most robust DEI prohibition in the nation, this bill mandates a fundamental shift in the operation of our higher education institutions,” Creighton said in his letter.
A UT department chair who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the terminations publicly, told the Statesman that they were contacted by their dean Tuesday morning to notify them that an employee in the department would be terminated. That employee, according to the chair, had previously worked in a DEI-related role but was reassigned to a new position and duties as part of the school’s compliance with SB
17. In previous communications about the anti-DEI law, Hartzell had assured the community that the school will continue to support all students while complying with the law. Hartzell, since December, had not addressed the university community about the school’s continued efforts to comply with SB 17 until Tuesday when he announced the Division of Campus and Community Engagement was shutting down.
‘Y’all are taking away lifesaving services’
UT senior Bibi Macias, a first-generation college student involved in student agencies previously housed in the nowshuttered Multicultural Engagement Center, said the news of staff members losing their jobs and as well as the Division of Campus and Community Engagement (formerly Diversity and Community Engagement Division) closing is “disgusting.”
“Heartbreaking and devastating don’t begin to cover my feelings about it,” Macias said. “Y’all are taking away lifesaving services.”
As a first-generation student, Macias said, the Community Engagement Division has been an important resource for her. She said its support had a drastic impact on students’ experience and comfort on campus. But she also worries about the staff members, who have dedicated so much to support students.
“They’re messing with people’s lives,” Macias said.
Students and professors have accused the university of overcomplying with the law – UT has shut down programs like Monarch, which helped undocumented students navigate school applications, internships and financial aid; and shuttered the Multicultural Engagement Center, which served as a “home away from home” for students of multiple multicultural identities and was open to everyone. They’ve argued that SB 17 and the university’s compliance with it is creating a chilling effect on recruitment and retention – Macias fears it will affect graduation rates for marginalized student groups.
Some conservative lawmakers, who have celebrated ending DEI programs at universities and colleges, have said the Legislature’s work to end “woke” policies, or identity politics, at institutions of higher learning is not finished.
UT, like all public universities, went through drastic changes in the weeks and months leading up to SB 17’s Jan. 1 effective date. In December, UT announced it was replacing its Gender and Sexuality Center with the Women’s Community Center, shifting the center’s focus from LGBTQ+ issues to gender-related matters.
“With its depth, breadth and extraordinary expertise, the Division of Campus and Community Engagement will continue to distinguish UT Austin as uniquely capable of meeting the demands of a rapidly changing campus, state and world,” LaToya Smith, vice president of campus and community engagement, said in an email to the school community in December about the division’s changes. “We are here for all.”
Macias, who is involved in the QTBIPOCA and Latinx Community Affairs student agencies that lost UT sponsorship before Jan. 1, said SB 17 creates more pressure for students to create and maintain safe spaces for historically underrepresented and marginalized peoples. Macias’s younger sister, a UT freshman, won’t have the resources she did, she said.
“How do we survive as these institutions within UT?” Macias asked.
“... this bill mandates a fundamental shift in the operation of our higher education institutions.”
Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe