Will may not be enough to avoid con­flict

Baltimore Sun Sunday - - LIFE&TRAVEL - By Danielle Braff

Be­fore Mara Mark­zon’s grand­mother died, she clearly and evenly di­vided her as­sets in her will.

But Mark­zon’s grand­mother ne­glected to de­tail where some of her per­sonal pos­ses­sions — her books, her cos­tume jew­elry, her purses — should go. An ar­gu­ment about those sen­ti­men­tal items en­sued, per­ma­nently di­vid­ing the fam­ily, said Mark­zon, a so­cial worker in Chicago.

“Even in the best of sit­u­a­tions, the death brings up emo­tions even if there aren’t prob­lems go­ing into the sit­u­a­tion,” Mark­zon said.

Even with a will, emo­tions run high when a fam­ily mem­ber has just died and there is money to dis­trib­ute. Now you’re com­bin­ing two things that peo­ple have high emo­tional re­ac­tions to as part of life: death and money, said Kel­ley Scrocca, an es­tate plan­ning at­tor­ney for Swier Law Firm, who re­cently worked in Illi­nois but now works re­motely from Ger­many.

Nearly half of plan­ning pro­fes­sion­als agree that the No. 1 threat to es­tate plan­ning is fam­ily con­flict, ac­cord­ing to a 2018 poll by TD Wealth.

A big part of the prob­lem is lack of com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Only

21% of peo­ple tell their fam­ily mem­bers what to ex­pect in the will, lead­ing to con­fu­sion. And most peo­ple ex­pect to in­herit more than $100,000, but re­ceive less than that, ac­cord­ing to Ameriprise Fi­nan­cial.

“Money can be a sen­si­tive topic,” said Aliyyah Camp, pub­lisher at the fi­nan­cial com­par­i­son site Fin­der. “When you add the com­pli­ca­tions of fam­ily re­la­tion­ships, it’s easy for is­sues to arise.”

One side of the fam­ily may think they’re owed more be­cause they paid for their mother’s phone bill over the past few years, while the other side may say that they were promised a clock, but it wasn’t writ­ten in the will, said Scrocca, who de­scribed the es­tate plan­ning pro­fes­sion as 60% law and 40% ther­apy.

Scrocca said she’s seen fam­i­lies ruin their re­la­tion­ships over $5,000. She’s also seen par­ents leave one child money with the un­der­stand­ing that that child would take care of the other sib­lings with spe­cial needs, but that money was quickly gam­bled away or taken by cred­i­tors.

“I’ve seen a sib­ling be named ‘executor,’ and then es­sen­tially squat in the house, not pay­ing taxes or keep­ing it up, mean­while the other sib­lings are stuck hav­ing to go to court to try to get the house sold so they can get their in­her­i­tance,” Scrocca said.

Camp said the best way to avoid in­her­i­tance ar­gu­ments is to hold a meet­ing with the peo­ple af­fected by it. When­ever you make ad­just­ments to the will, meet with ev­ery­one again, she said.

“It may be un­com­fort­able to dis­cuss your will so early, but it’s bet­ter than leav­ing your loved ones con­fused or in dis­agree­ment later on,” she said.

When dis­cussing the will, the dis­tri­bu­tion of money can be a touchy sub­ject, es­pe­cially if one per­son needs it more than the other.

Shlomo Slatkin, a li­censed clin­i­cal pro­fes­sional coun­selor and a cer­ti­fied imago re­la­tion­ship ther­a­pist, sug­gested giv­ing all chil­dren equal por­tions of the will, even if one child is in deeper fi­nan­cial need.

“Trou­bles hap­pen when the dis­tri­bu­tion is im­bal­anced, or one per­son is writ­ten out of the will,” Slatkin said.

If a client de­cides to leave a child a greater per­cent­age of the es­tate than the other child, it’s rec­om­mended that the client share this in­for­ma­tion soon af­ter sign­ing the doc­u­ments, said Deb­o­rah Dan­ger, a Mas­sachusetts at­tor­ney.

Full dis­clo­sure cre­ates an op­por­tu­nity for chil­dren to ask the

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.