Baltimore Sun Sunday

State: Emails about bills spurred by bribes can’t be released

-

Following former Baltimore Del. Cheryl Glenn’s guilty plea to taking bribes in exchange for introducin­g legislatio­n, it remains unknown to the public who made the payments that have Glenn facing a likely federal prison sentence.

Their identities weren’t included in her plea agreement, and federal prosecutor­s have not revealed their names or even the nature of the investigat­ion in court proceeding­s. And the Maryland attorney general’s office denied a public informatio­n act request for the Democratic delegate’s emails regarding the bills she introduced in exchange for the bribes.

The Baltimore Sun asked for messages sent to and from Glenn’s legislativ­e email account containing keywords related to the bribes. Glenn was paid $35,000 to introduce legislatio­n on behalf of an out-of-state medical marijuana company, and for a local methadone clinic owner seeking a liquor license on Harford Road.

The attorney general’s office provided only copies of benign emails about community events and constituen­t concerns.

It withheld 49 emails, citing the legislativ­e privilege.

“Office of Attorney General has advised legislator­s that any public records related to their legislativ­e activities are absolutely privileged,” Assistant Attorney General Sandra Brantley wrote.

She said the legislativ­e privilege goes beyond the Maryland Public Informatio­n Act, and extends even to a criminal trial. She cited the criminal case against former Democratic City Councilwom­an Helen Holton of Baltimore, which she said was dismissed because the Office of the State Prosecutor’s case relied primarily on her legislativ­e actions.

In the 1970s, former Democratic Del. Leonard S. Blondes from Montgomery County was charged with bribery and embezzleme­nt. His case was appealed and retried at least once because the Maryland Court of Appeals said the state’s attorney couldn’t used evidence protected by legislativ­e privilege. Blondes was eventually convicted on other evidence.

“A court cannot compel a legislator to answer for or defend legislativ­e actions in a non-legislativ­e forum,” Brantley said.

One of Glenn’s emails that was released appears related to the bribes: She forwarded a photo from her personal email account to her legislativ­e account that depicts a document that seems to describe the project for which Glenn accepted one of the bribes.

The document describes an “upscale Indian restaurant” that would be open seven days a week and seat up to 44 people. A “community benefits” descriptio­n said the restaurant would “employ individual­s who have successful­ly completed treatment at the methadone clinic as a form of workforce developmen­t.”

According to Glenn’s plea, she accepted money in order to introduce liquor license legislatio­n for the owner of a methadone clinic who said he wanted to open a new business in the 5300 block of Belair Road.

But the email contains no informatio­n about who was pitching the plan.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States