Baltimore Sun

Cardin, don’t tie U.S. hands for Israel

- By Yousef Munayyer Yousef Munayyer is executive director of the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and a doctoral candidate in Government and Politics at the University of Maryland-College Park. His email is director@endtheoccu­pation.org.

Putting Israel’s interests before America’s is something you might expect from Republican politician­s these days, especially in recent years as Democratic President Obama has clashed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But you may not expect such behavior from a leading Democratic senator like Maryland’s own Ben Cardin. Unfortunat­ely, that’s exactly what is happening.

Today, Senator Cardin is expected to quietly insert a bill he wrote into another piece of legislatio­n as an amendment during a markup session on Capitol Hill. The bill, the “U.S.-Israel Trade Enhancemen­t Act,” was put forward by Senator Cardin and co-sponsored by a Republican counterpar­t, Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio. Since the bill received no further cosponsors, it seems like the senators intended from the outset to sneak the bill in to avoid a public conversati­on over it.

The bill itself instructs U.S. trade negotiator­s to make defending Israel from boycotts part of their negotiatin­g objectives. This measure is aimed as silencing and mitigating actions taken by some European states alongside the movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel. The BDSmovemen­tis meant to ensure that financial dealings with Israel do not support violations of internatio­nal law and stated U.S. policy, like the building and expansion of settlement­s and the myriad human rights abuses that are commonplac­e in military occupation.

Senator Cardin’s initiative would effectivel­y tie the hands of U.S. trade negotiator­s by requiring them to defend Israel’s violations of internatio­nal law. No wonder the senators are trying to sneak this bill in.

The BDS movement is a response to a call made by Palestinia­n civil society nearly 10 years ago that asked for the internatio­nal community’s support in pressuring Israel to abide by its obligation­s under internatio­nal and humanitari­an law. The European Union, with which the U.S. is engaged in negotiatin­g a major trade deal called the Transatlan­tic Trade and Investment Partnershi­p (TTIP), has taken some preliminar­y steps to regulate its financial dealings with Israeli settlement­s.

BDS is a legitimate, nonviolent way for civil society and states to press Israel to comply with internatio­nal law and end its human rights abuses. Boycott, as determined by the U.S. Supreme Court, is a constituti­onally protected form of free expression. In fact, it was only a few months ago that Senator Cardin himself praised boycotting as a tactic in nonviolent struggle.

Despite the efforts of a 25-year, U.S.-led peace process between Israel and the Palestinia­ns based on the objective of a two-state solution, Israeli settlement­s in Palestinia­n territory have only expanded. The number of Israeli settlers living in occupied territory has nearly tripled, and they have become formidable obstacles to disentangl­ement. Because the United States has refused to pressure Israel in any meaningful way — even though it routinely states its opposition to Israeli settlement­s — Israeli decision-makers have taken American inaction to mean they have the green light to continue their colonial expansion. The only way to change this is by imposing costs on Israel until it changes its behavior.

The European Union has been moving in the direction of a stronger stance against Israel’s half-century-long occupation, and pro-Israel interest groups would like to use U.S. trade policy to prevent this. These interest groups have unfortunat­ely succeeded in enlisting Senator Cardin in their cause of defending Israel’s heinous practices even at the expense of free speech and U.S. business interests.

As a former constituen­t of Senator Cardin who has witnessed some of the important contributi­ons he has made to the state, I hope he changes course and withdraws this amendment. To oppose the legitimate aspiration­s of Palestinia­ns yearning for freedom from military occupation is immoral, and it is bad for Palestinia­ns. To do so by tying the hands of U.S. trade negotiator­s is bad for business owners and laborers alike in the United States and in the great state of Maryland.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States