Baltimore Sun

2 Md. campuses among 130 shut by ITT Tech

For-profit college denied federal student-loan access

- By Carrie Wells The Chicago Tribune and the Associated Press contribute­d to this article. cwells@baltsun.com

Two ITT Technical Institute campuses in Maryland are among more than 130 that were shut down nationwide by ITT Educationa­l Services on Tuesday after the U.S. Department of Education prohibited it last month from enrolling new students who use federal financial aid.

The decision ended the fall quarter before it started for about 40,000 students as the Carmel, Ind.-based company laid off more than 8,000 employees.

About 350 students were enrolled at ITT’s campus in Hanover, and about 440 students at its campus in Owings Mills. It employed three full-time and 49 parttime faculty members in Hanover and five full-time and 54 part-time faculty members in Owings Mills, according to the Education Department.

Students left in the lurch with student loans and needing classes were offered some options by the Department of Education. Affected students could have their federal student loans forgiven and start their education over, or they could transfer their academic credits to another college, which could make them ineligible for loan forgivenes­s.

Federal officials have been ramping up oversight of ITT, one of the largest for-profit U.S. educationa­l firms, and other companies like it.

Last month, the Education Department banned ITT from enrolling new students with federal financial aid, citing its lack of compliance with accreditat­ion standards. It also ordered ITT to increase the amount it set aside to cover liabilitie­s, such as refunds in case the college shut About 350 students were enrolled at ITT’s campus in Hanover. down, from about $90 million to about $247 million.

Instead of complying, ITT decided to shut down after 50 years in business.

The company defended itself in a statement, saying it has worked “tirelessly to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulation­s” and calling itself the victim of “regulatory assault.”

“With what we believe is a complete disregard by the U.S. Department of Education for due process to the company, hundreds of thousands of current students and alumni and more than 8,000 employees will be negatively affected,” the company said in a statement.

Launched in 1966, ITT Tech in recent years offered degrees in six areas of study: informatio­n technology, electronic­s technology, drafting and design, business, criminal justice and nursing.

U.S. Education Secretary John B. King Jr. defended the increased oversight of ITT and said the department had concerns about ITT’s “administra­tive capacity, organizati­onal integrity, financial viability, and ability to serve students.”

“The school’s decisions have put its students and millions of dollars in taxpay- er-funded federal student aid at risk,” he said in a posting on the department’s website intended to inform affected students about the department’s action. King urged ITT students not to give up.

“Higher education remains the clearest path to economic opportunit­y and security,” he wrote. “Restarting or continuing your education at a high-quality, reputable institutio­n may feel like a setback today, but odds are it will pay off in the long run.”

The move comes amid a crackdown by the U.S. Education Department on forprofit educationa­l chains that have come under increased scrutiny and criticism for providing students with substandar­d educations — and sometimes worthless degrees — and leaving them saddled with huge amounts of debt. Last year, Corinthian Colleges shut down after the Education Department blocked it from enrolling students receiving federal financial aid.

Baltimore-based Laureate Education, a for-profit chain which owns more than 70 colleges around the world, declined to comment. The company, which only has a handful of U.S. schools, has not faced the same federal scrutiny as ITT and Corinthian.

Barmak Nassirian, director of federal relations and policy analysis at the American Associatio­n of State Colleges and Universiti­es, said the federal government’s hand was forced by ITT’s legal and accreditat­ion challenges.

“The federal government has to play the role of the undertaker at some point as these operations collapse under the weight of their own toxic outcomes,” Nassirian said. “At some point, the feds have to step in and say ‘enough.’”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States