Baltimore Sun

Cardin: Senate helping Baltimore water upgrades

- Ben Cardin, Washington, D.C. The writer, a Democrat, represents Maryland in the U.S. Senate and is a memberof the Senate Committee on Environmen­t and Public Works.

“Read the bill.” It’s a common refrain directed at lawmakers, but in this case, Richard J. Douglas (“Blame Md.’s congressio­nal delegation for Baltimore’s water woes,” Oct. 19) should try reading the Water Resources Developmen­t Act (WRDA) before making unfounded accusation­s about what is or is not included. What would he find in the comprehens­ive 600-page bill? That the Senate-passed language, much of it pulled directly from legislatio­n I authored, will indeed “put significan­t federal money into Baltimore’s storm water/sewage infrastruc­ture.”

Side by side with Sen. Barbara Mikulski, I fought to make sure Baltimore and cities like it nationwide have the financing they need to upgrade their systems and stop dumping raw sewage into our rivers — rivers we use as a source of drinking water and to fish and swim. And yes, it will help the Chesapeake Bay oysters, which support our economy and help clean the bay’s waters, but it also makes the replacemen­t or rehabilita­tion of aging treatment, storage or distributi­on facilities and public water system security measures eligible for federal funding — activities which, until now, were solely the responsibi­lity of a city and its taxpayers. Baltimore citizens are being asked to pay more to upgrade our system to guarantee clean, safe drinking water which is why, through WRDA, Maryland’s senators have committed the federal government to enhancing its role in paying for these upgrades. The bill also redefines what it means for water to be “affordable” to help more poor and middle-class Marylander­s struggling to pay their bills.

It is appalling that Baltimore City’s public schools have had their drinking fountains turned off for nearly a decade because of the lead problems; WRDAwillma­keadiffere­nce. It took hard work and some sharp elbows to keep intact $300 million over five years for Baltimore and other cities to replace lead pipes, along with testing, planning, corrosion control and education about the dangers of lead in drinking water, and it also authorizes $100 million for grants to carry out a voluntary program to test the water in schools and child care centers.

Mr. Douglas’ wild armchair critique of WRDA fails miserably in understand­ing the resources this bill will bring to our state. Backed by a bipartisan 95-3 margin, we are making a much-needed “national investment in Baltimore’s wastewater infrastruc­ture.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States