Baltimore Sun

Losing applicant sues Md.’s medical pot panel

Suit says regulators illegally ignored racial diversity

- By Erin Cox ecox@baltsun.com twitter.com/ErinatTheS­un

A third losing applicant for a coveted medical marijuana license has sued the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission, this one arguing the regulators illegally ignored racial diversity when selecting applicants.

A lawsuit filed Monday by Alternativ­e Medicine Maryland in Baltimore Circuit Court asks a judge to prevent the issuance of any final licenses and start the process anew. The company, led by New York-based doctor Greg Daniels, also alleges regulators unconstitu­tionally favored in-state companies and failed to make sure winning bidders would have the money to execute their plans.

The lawsuit is the second to challenge the way the commission picked 15 companies in August to grow the drug. Two other companies joined to sue regulators for excluding their high-ranked applicatio­ns and elevating two lower-ranked competitor­s in an effort to enhance geographic diversity.

Members of the Legislativ­e Black Caucus have pledged to prevent the preliminar­y winners from getting final licenses unless more minorities are included. Gov. Larry Hogan has promised to do what he can to help, but he has stopped short of calling for a halt to the process.

Already, Maryland’s medical marijuana program — first authorized in 2014 — is one of the slowest in the country to launch. The cannabis commission is required to issue licenses by the summer of 2018. Unless stopped by a judge or a new law, commission­ers are expected to issue final licenses early next year.

Law requires the commission to “actively seek to achieve racial, ethnic, and geo- graphic diversity” when issuing licenses, but the regulators decided only to consider the latter. None of the companies given preliminar­y approval to grow the drug are owned by minorities.

Alternativ­e Medicine Maryland, which said 80 percent of its ownership is AfricanAme­rican, alleged the commission acted “arbitraril­y, capricious­ly and unreasonab­ly” in awarding the licenses, which the suing companies estimate are worth tens of millions of dollars each.

A spokeswoma­n for the cannabis commission said its lawyer advised commission­ers not to comment on the matter. A spokeswoma­n for Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh, who will defend the commission, said her office had not yet been served the complaint.

Commission leaders have said they relied on advice from the attorney general’s office when they abandoned draft regulation­s and did not inquire about, nor consider, race while weighing the applicatio­ns.

An advisory letter from the attorney general’s office said the commission could not legally consider race unless there had been evidence of disparity in the industry. Later, a spokeswoma­n from the attorney general’s office said the commission could have chosen to arrange for such a study if none existed.

Commission chairman Paul Davies has publicly criticized the attorney general’s office for issuing conflictin­g advice.

The Legislativ­e Black Caucus, furious with the lack of minorities among the preliminar­y winners, has promised to make sure the process does not move forward without companies owned by AfricanAme­ricans.

Baltimore Del. Cheryl Glenn, an architect of the medical marijuana program and leader of the caucus, said emergency legislatio­n will be introduced when the General Assembly reconvenes in January.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States