Baltimore Sun

Two clean energy bills in Md.; one clear choice

- By Gina Angiola AndTim Whitehouse 1.) It ends counterpro­ductive subsidies. 2.) The 100 percent bill creates a more stable, transparen­t and effective mechanism to accelerate solar developmen­t. 3.) The 100 percent bill incentiviz­es offshore wind projects

This week, the Maryland General Assembly will evaluate two very different proposals for the future of energy and climate policy in our state. One, The 100% Clean Renewable Energy and Equity Act, will fundamenta­lly change the trajectory for wind and solar developmen­t, strengthen our economy and build a solid pathway to using only clean renewable electricit­y by 2035. The other, The Clean Energy and Jobs Act (CEJA), will accelerate the current Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) mechanisms to reach a target of 50 percent renewable electricit­y by 2030.

There are five key reasons why Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibi­lity supports the 100 percent bill. Under the current RPS, ratepayers subsidize polluting sources of electricit­y generation, including the burning of garbage and wood waste. In 2015, Maryland ratepayers paid more than $46 million to industries inside and outside of Maryland that added — rather than reduced — greenhouse gas emissions and other dangerous pollutants to the atmosphere. These harm air, water and soil quality; contribute to respirator­y, cardiovasc­ular and other ailments and add to climate disruption.

The100 percent bill, by contrast, removes all financial subsidies to polluting sources of electricit­y generation. Renewable energy, by definition, will only include generation from wind, solar, tidal and small hydropower.

Maryland’s current RPS uses tradable solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) to subsidize solar energy developmen­t. The value of these credits fluctuates based on supply and demand, creating boom and bust conditions that can damage the solar industry in our state. The price of a Maryland SREC went from $180 in 2015 to approximat­ely $6 at present, putting solar jobs in jeopardy.

The100 percent bill, by contrast, replaces SRECs with a predictabl­e upfront rebate through the Megawatt Block Program. This program provides the highest rebates to early adopters; rebates then decrease over time as solar costs decline, ultimately reaching zero when incentives are no longer necessary.

Separate incentive rates for residentia­l, community solar, commercial and utilitysca­le developmen­t ensure a balanced approach to solar developmen­t in Maryland. Businesses and ratepayers want transparen­cy and predictabi­lity; block programs provide both.

Endowed with the Port of Baltimore, Maryland is well positioned to become a manufactur­ing hub for the industry, bringing good jobs to our region for years to come. But this requires a commitment to support offshore wind over the next decade or more.

Maryland is competing with other states, notably Massachuse­tts, New York and New Jersey, which already have or are close to setting ambitious targets. Without similar targets set in the near future, Maryland will lose out on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunit­y to create a large number of manufactur­ing jobs. The CEJA lacks a sufficient long-term commitment to offshore wind to enable us to win those jobs. Legislator­s have a clear choice if they want to support a revival of manufactur­ing in Maryland.

Like New Jersey, it limits energy bills for low-income households to six percent of gross income, which in turn will help reduce evictions, improve health outcomes and stabilize communitie­s.

The targets for solar build-out are ambitious but mirror what has already taken place in California. The targets for wind developmen­t are consistent with the goals of other East Coast states. And, with 100 percent clean renewable electricit­y in place by 2035, we will be ready for the electric transporta­tion revolution currently under way.

Taking into account the social cost of carbon emissions as published by EPA under the previous administra­tion, the cost of transition­ing to renewable electricit­y will be lower than the cost of not making these changes. And that is even before including the positive economic and fiscal impact of the thousands of jobs that will be created.

The costs of damage from extreme weather are already setting records. Sixteen major weather events caused $306 billion of damage in the U.S. in 2017, averaging about $2,500 per household. Given current political realities at the federal level, states must lead the transition to a clean renewable energy economy.

The 100 percent bill provides a wellconstr­ucted pathway to 100 percent clean renewable electricit­y that prioritize­s public health, job growth, environmen­tal justice, equity, fiscal responsibi­lity and climate protection. We urge the Maryland General Assembly to step up and pass the 100 percent bill.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States