Baltimore Sun

Not again, Dr. Harris

When will Ocean City and its congressma­n realize they face much bigger threats than the possibilit­y that beachgoers might see tiny turbines on the horizon?

-

Our view:

Last week, Rep. Andy Harris, a Republican who represents Maryland’s 1st Congressio­nal District, including the entire Eastern Shore, issued a press release to let his constituen­ts know he was proudly standing in the way of offshore wind power. Specifical­ly, the Johns Hopkinstra­ined anesthesio­logist convinced the House Committee on Appropriat­ions to add language to the fiscal 2019 Interior Department funding bill related to two wind farms planned near Ocean City.

His beef? Under certain conditions, the tall wind turbines “with red lights atop each tower” would be “visible from the beaches of Ocean City and Assateague Island National Seashore.” If that complaint of bad aesthetics sounds familiar, that’s because he’s made it before — as has the Ocean City Council, which voted to oppose the wind turbines earlier this year. Together, along with the town’s mayor, they’ve been a chorus of naysayers not heard since the fictional Harold Hill warned about a pool hall in “The Music Man.” Oh, you’re going to get falling property values and a damaged tourism trade right here in Ocean City. Trouble, trouble, trouble, trouble.

Here’s the bottom line, however: The “rider” the congressma­n added to the bill is just as big a flim-flam as any Iowa boys band. It merely calls on the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to consult with federal and state authoritie­s about the project before it’s built, something the agency should be doing anyway. The developers say they have no problem with that. It’s likely Dr. Harris would have pushed for tougher restrictio­ns (he’s done it before only to be rebuked by the Senate), but he knew that Sen. Lisa Murkowski, chair of the Senate committee that oversees energy and natural resources, stood in his way.

No doubt one can find beachgoers who fret about the presence of off-shore turbines, even though the developers have pledged to build them no closer than 17 miles from land, roughly the equivalent of the commute from Oriole Park at Camden Yards to Dr. Harris’ home in Cockeysvil­le. And these sensitive souls deserve to be heard — as they were before the Maryland Public Service Commission and the Maryland General Assembly, both of which had an opportunit­y to halt the project in its tracks over the past year, and both of which declined. The reality is there’s little evidence that the presence of wind turbines will steer visitors away from Maryland’s Atlantic Ocean resort, but there’s overwhelmi­ng data on the harm caused by burning fossil fuels, particular­ly as sea levels continue to rise and coastal communitie­s like Ocean City are put at great risk.

In announcing approval for the U.S. Wind and Deepwater Wind projects last year, the Maryland Public Service Commission noted that the state was now positioned to be a leader in renewable energy and that nearly 10,000 direct and indirect jobs would be created. When Ocean City officials pressed their case to lawmakers in Annapolis earlier this year, they did not get far. Legislatio­n requiring the turbines be Rep. Andy Harris has made another attempt to derail the constructi­on of wind turbines off the Ocean City coast. constructe­d no closer than 30 miles (a measure developers say would essentiall­y scrap the project) was handily defeated in committee.

Why is it assumed that a windmill on the distant horizon, flashing red light or no, would be ruinous? Polls show Americans overwhelmi­ngly support clean, renewable energy. The developers say their surveys of Ocean City vacationer­s suggest the wind turbines have broad support. Why aren’t Ocean City’s leaders bragging about how their community will be a national leader in the green movement? Block Island Wind, the nation’s first offshore wind farm, had no such ill effect on Rhode Island, and that project’s five turbines are just 3.8 miles offshore — less than one-fourth the distance involved in Ocean City.

But what’s most troubling is that Ocean City and, indeed, much of Representa­tive Harris’ district, lie in the path of rising sea levels, a major effect of climate change. If the congressma­n wants something truly destructiv­e to worry about, it should be not just the devaluatio­n of beachfront property but the prospect of billions of dollars in property being completely wiped out. Talk about the loss of livelihood­s; how about adding the loss of lives to go with it? One offshore wind project obviously won’t do much to prevent the coming floods, but at least it’s a small step in the right direction — with the added bonus of putting the state at the center of an economic revolution.

Mr. Harris may be comforted in knowing that Cockeysvil­le won’t be swept away if, as Maryland Sea Grant notes, waters in the Chesapeake Bay rise 2.1 feet by 2050, but voters in his district should not rest so easy — not when their congressma­n is anxious to sabotage clean energy in his home state. For someone who claims to be a political conservati­ve, he certainly has an odd way of expressing it by advocating for a greater federal regulatory reach, killing private-sector jobs and ignoring the danger his constituen­ts face.

 ?? DAVID ANDERSON/BALTIMORE SUN MEDIA GROUP ??
DAVID ANDERSON/BALTIMORE SUN MEDIA GROUP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States