Baltimore Sun

Lack of regional coordinati­on persists

- By Nicholas Finio And Casey Dawkins Nicholas Finio (nfinio@gmail.com) is a research associate at the National Center for Smart Growth within the University of Maryland, where Casey Dawkins (dawkins1@umd.edu) is a professor of urban studies and planning. W

Nearly half of Maryland residents call the Baltimore Metropolit­an area home. This home, however, is politicall­y fractured, despite the economic ties that bridge Carroll County to Annapolis and Columbia to Bel Air.

In the Baltimore region, planning for housing and economic developmen­t occurs almost entirely at the county and city level. While counties and the city have long worked together to plan for transporta­tion policy, lack of political consensus has left holes in the region’s transporta­tion system.

The most visible of these is the lack of major east-west transit through the region’s core — a gap that the canceled Red Line would have filled. Traffic congestion is worsening as low-income residents continue to find it difficult to access employment. Further, that lack of political consensus has created a patchwork of housing and zoning policies, created to meet unique jurisdicti­onal needs, which may not be efficient or equitable on a regional scale. Housing costs continue to escalate, and low-income families find it increasing­ly difficult to find stable, quality housing.

Three years ago, the “Opportunit­y Collaborat­ive,” a consortium of regional government­s, nonprofits, and businesses released the Regional Plan for Sustainabl­e Developmen­t (RPSD). This plan was the final product of a multi-year, multimilli­ondollar effort that was funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t. The goal of the planning effort was to develop coordinate­d strategies to address the growing economic and social disparitie­s that pose a challenge to the long-term sustainabi­lity and health of the greater Baltimore region.

The National Center for Smart Growth (NCSG), where we work, was a partner in that consortium. We recently completed a retrospect­ive review of the RPSD planning process. Our conclusion­s are based on dozens of interviews with stakeholde­rs and experts who participat­ed in the process. In this election year, we would like to call attention to the results of our study.

The RPSD planning process showed the strength of local networks in addressing issues like housing, transit and equity, but the experience after the plan highlighte­d the region’s main gap: the lack of coordinati­on among local government­s. The Opportunit­y Collaborat­ive’s work showed via maps the inequitabl­e access to opportunit­y that limits social mobility for so many regional residents. By lack of access to opportunit­y, we refer to the uneven distributi­on of quality public schools, safe neighborho­ods, social networks, and health care — all factors that can influence an individual's life path. This inequality in access to opportunit­y is geographic­ally concentrat­ed in a number of places.

Enhancing access to opportunit­y requires regional strategies to promote the constructi­on of affordable housing in highopport­unity areas, while expanding access to transporta­tion and economic developmen­t in low-opportunit­y areas. Some progress is being made in housing, with programs such as the regional project-based voucher program. Progress remains stymied in housing equity, however, evi- denced by the continued opposition to policy changes like those proposed in the HOME Act, which would eliminate housing discrimina­tion based on source of income.

Planning for regional fair housing continues to be divorced from local housing policies, with disastrous consequenc­es for low-income communitie­s. Regional expansion of public transporta­tion remains stymied, though the conversati­on about the Red Line has not stopped after its cancellati­on. While the region and the state are experienci­ng a period of strong economic growth, the geographic distributi­on of this growth remains uneven.

The main obstacle to implementa­tion of policy choices suggested by the RPSD is a lack of political buy-in. Politician­s remain focused on their individual jurisdicti­ons, as their opportunit­ies for regional coordinati­on are few, and the political infrastruc­ture for such cooperatio­n is mostly non-existent.

We hope that all officials running for local and statewide office this year remember the 2015 RPSD, which was released in the aftermath of Freddie Gray’s death. This region’s future can only be bright if the inequities perpetuate­d by decades of regional decision making are addressed at the regional level.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States