Baltimore Sun

Harper happy to stay with Nationals

All-Star ‘glad I’m still inside this clubhouse’ after team considered trade offers

- By Chelsea Janes Chelsea Janes@washpost.com twitter.com/chelsea_janes Washington Post reporter Jorge Castillo contribute­d to this article.

Starting some time Monday evening, as Tuesday’s 4 p.m. nonwaiver trade deadline inched nearer, Bryce Harper-mania seized the baseball world. Word spread that the Washington Nationals were listening to offers for the six-time All-Star, and slowly but surely, news trickled out that other teams might have legitimate interest. As of late Monday night, people familiar with their plans said the Nationals had not ruled out trading Harper. Everything seemed to be gaining the momentum these things always do at this time of year, hurtling toward a conclusion suddenly deemed inevitable.

Then general manager Mike Rizzo, who said he went sleepless Monday night, sent a text message to The Washington Post.

“Bryce is not going anywhere,” it read. “I believe in this team.”

When 4 p.m. came around, Rizzo had backed his words with actions that supported them. The only move the Nationals made was to send reliever Brandon Kintzler to Chicago for right-handed pitcher Jhon Romero, a move that will save them at least $6 million over the next two seasons. Harper was in the Nationals clubhouse and in their lineup, playing right field and hitting third. Nothing else had changed. The Nationals were standing pat, hoping this roster can play to its potential enough to overcome two inexperien­ced teams ahead of them in the National League East standings.

“We had several discussion­s with teams about a whole litany of our players. Bryce was one of them. Several teams had more than passing interest,” Rizzo said. “We did our due diligence on Bryce, and about five or six other of our players, and couldn’t come up with a deal that made sense for us for the 2018 season and beyond. So we didn’t make a deal until really late this afternoon when the Cubs came to us with a deal that made sense, and we reacted by trading Kintzler.”

The reason Rizzo and manager Dave Martinez gave for that move was that the Nationals have enough depth to spare a veteran, and wanted to find room for the more versatile Wander Suero, who can provide multiple innings at a time. “We felt that Suero has earned the opportunit­y to pitch in the big leagues. He’s shown us flashes of brilliance up here,” said Rizzo, who acknowledg­ed that with now-healthy Koda Glover at Syracuse, the Nationals have plenty of depth. Rizzo also cited “financial flexibilit­y” moving forward as partial motivation.

The Nationals would also have cleared more money by trading Kelvin Herrera or Ryan Madson, both of whom are free agents after this season, while the 33-year-old Kintzler has a complicate­d club and player option that meant he was controllab­le for “We had several discussion­s with teams about a whole litany of our players. Bryce was one of them. Several teams had more than passing interest,” Nationals general manager Mike Rizzo said of six-time All-Star Bryce Harper, above. two seasons. He was not the obvious choice to move. Some within the organizati­on speculate the deal was much about Kintzler’s willingnes­s to speak his mind in the clubhouse as his performanc­e. Kintzler was open about the effects his usage and workload had on his performanc­e, though he was pitching to a 3.45 ERA in 45 appearance­s this season. He was a major presence in the clubhouse, leaned on by veteran starters and less-experience­d relievers alike for advice on mechanics and approach.

“I thought they were joking,” Kintzler said of the deal. “They called me and I said, ‘Am I traded?’ They said, ‘Yeah.’ I thought they were joking. Pretty shocked.”

In the days leading up to the deadline, the Nationals also fielded calls and gauged interest on high-priced relievers such as Kelvin Herrera and Shawn Kelley, while continuing to pursue Miami Marlins catcher J.T. Realmuto. According to people familiar with the talks between those teams, the Nationals upgraded their offer for Realmuto this week and Miami rejected it anyway.

But the bulk of the Nationals’ concerns over the last two days centered around Harper. One team that spoke to the Nationals late Monday night said the Nationals told it they had multiple deals in the works for multiple players, including Harper. That team got the sense the Nationals got cold feet late last night. Rizzo said they never got the right offer.

“It would’ve had to have been a spectacu- lar set of circumstan­ces for us to move a player of Bryce Harper’s ability level,” Rizzo said. “and we didn’t get anything that met those qualificat­ions.”

Harper said Rizzo called him “earlier yesterday” to tell him he would not be traded, but later said that call came Tuesday morning. Rizzo said he called Harper “later [Monday night]” which would be in keeping with what people familiar with the Nationals’ talks said: Until Monday night, they were listening and considerin­g offers. By the early morning hours, they had decided against a deal.

“I only got in touch with him when some informatio­n came out that we were in the midst of looking to trade Bryce Harper,” Rizzo said. “And I thought at that time, it was probably a good time to say that was false informatio­n and he wasn’t going to be traded.”

“I think whenever you hear your name or see your name on stuff you always wonder but I think that’s just the business end of the game, it’s part of the game and other teams are trying to get better and it’s just something that came up,” Harper said. “[I’m] glad I’m still inside this clubhouse.”

By trading Harper now, the Nationals would have a) guaranteed a handpicked return for a player who could leave in free agency and yield only a draft pick if he does, b) freed up a place in the outfield for top prospect Victor Robles, giving the Nationals a dynamic outfield rotation of Robles, Juan Soto, Michael A. Taylor and Adam Eaton, and c) relieved that ever-present cloud of speculatio­n about where Harper will go after this season and why he has been treated somewhat differentl­y here over the years. Harper has always qualified as polarizing, and comments like the one he made Saturday night — when he said the Nationals would not have lost had Realmuto been on their side — alienate teammates who take silent notice.

Rizzo has been a staunch, outspoken defender of Harper. He saw the benefits in getting an arbitratio­n deal done with Harper two years ahead of this tense free agent season. When an anonymous executive criticized Harper this spring, Rizzo found a reporter to whom he could defend Harper vehemently. The Lerner family, which owns the team, has gushed over Harper like one of its own, and Harper himself got emotional when speaking about his Nationals tenure after his victory in that hometown Home Run Derby. So while trading Harper now makes baseball sense if the Nationals do not think they can sign him anyway, it would also represent a seismic emotional shift in this franchise’s path. They decided to stick with Harper, and this roster in general, to see what it can become.

“I’m very happy to write Bryce’s name in the lineup still,” Martinez said, “and I’m looking forward to writing his name every day.”

 ?? PATRICK SMITH/GETTY IMAGES ??
PATRICK SMITH/GETTY IMAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States