Baltimore Sun

Frosh accuses fentanyl maker of scheme to defraud insurers

Attorney general seeks $20M in penalties from Insys

- By Ian Duncan

The Maryland attorney general’s office on Thursday accused the manufactur­er of a powerful fentanyl spray of violating consumer protection laws thousands of times by engaging in a “deceptive scheme” to buy the help of doctors and deceive insurance companies to boost sales.

The attorney general’s office is seeking $20 million in various penalties from Arizona-based Insys Therapeuti­cs for allegedly paying doctors thousands of dollars as rewards for writing prescripti­ons to treat conditions other than the drug’s approved purpose of managing the pain of cancer patients.

The money was supposedly for speaking engagement­s that the attorney general’s office alleges were often alcohol-fueled social events held at bars, strip clubs and private hotel rooms.

To convince reluctant insurers to cover the costs of the prescripti­ons, company employees were trained to lie about why the drug was being used, the attorney general’s office alleges in legal papers filed Thursday.

Insys reaped more than $20 million in revenue from 3,000 prescripti­ons written in Maryland, according to the “statement of charges” filed with the state’s consumer protection agency.

An Insys spokesman said it was company policy not to comment on legal proceeding­s.

FENTANYL ,

The allegation­s follow a years-long investigat­ion into Insys by the attorney general’s office. The case will be heard by an administra­tive judge, and Insys could appeal any ruling to Circuit Court.

Attorney General Brian Frosh said the company’s business practices led people in Maryland to become addicted to opioids after being prescribed the fentanyl spray.

“It’s an immediate release so that the person gets a high or a feeling that certainly alleviates pain — but it is also extremely addictive,” Frosh said.

Insys has been the subject of a longrunnin­g federal investigat­ion that has led to criminal charges against several doctors and company executives, including billionair­e founder John Kapoor. Kapoor has pleaded not guilty to fraud and racketeeri­ng charges in federal court in Massachuse­tts.

In August, the company agreed to pay at least $150 million to settle some of the allegation­s leveled by federal investigat­ors.

The company’s current management has been trying to move on from the allegation­s of wrongdoing, saying in a statement last month that the business was in the midst of an “ongoing transforma­tion.”

In February, the company issued a statement saying it was cooperatin­g with Frosh’s investigat­ion and had turned over more than 3.75 million pages of documents. The company said then that it had a “desire to address any concerns raised by its activities in the State of Maryland.”

But Frosh’s office questions whether Insys has been reformed and says in the legal filing that the company was unwilling to turn over some documents to investigat­ors.

Frosh said the case is aimed at “getting Insys to stop.” Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh said the case against Insys Therapeuti­cs is aimed at getting the Arizona company to stop its practices.

His office is asking the consumer protection agency to order Insys to pay $20 million in damages, penalties and returned profits it earned through the alleged scheme. In addition, Frosh has asked the agency to order the company to halt “unfair or deceptive trade practices” and to set up drug treatment programs for patients who received the fentanyl spray.

The consumer protection case is the latest effort by Maryland authoritie­s to hold drug makers and distributo­rs accountabl­e for what they say are destructiv­e efforts to push opioid medication­s onto patients, fueling an overdose epidemic that now claims thousands of lives a year in the state. Fentanyl, an opioid many times more powerful than heroin, is responsibl­e for an increasing number of those deaths.

Several Maryland counties have cases against drug companies pending in federal court. Lawyers for Baltimore are due in federal court Thursday to argue that its case should be allowed to move forward. Frosh’s office has other ongoing investigat­ions.

But the attorney general said the allegation­s against Insys were serious enough to be brought in a case of its own.

“The facts that we lay out in the statement of charges are very damning,” he said.

Frosh’s investigat­ors allege that Insys embarked on the scheme to overcome the strict federal regulation­s that applied to the fentanyl spray, which it marketed as Subsys. The U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion approved the spray in 2012 only for seriously ill cancer patients, which limited its profitabil­ity.

The attorney general’s office alleges that Insys began marketing the spray to socalled “pill mills” — clinics that prescribe high volumes of opioid pain medication­s — to make more money.

In the legal filing, investigat­ors quoted a former Insys sales representa­tive who told them: “You think I’d be calling on oncologist­s. I didn’t have a single oncologist on my list. That was a red flag.”

Doctors who agreed to write many Subsys prescripti­ons were rewarded with fees investigat­ors say were disguised as payments for speaking engagement­s. Prescriber­s in Maryland got between $1,000 and $5,400 for single events, which were often lavish affairs featuring expensive wine and other perks paid for by Insys.

The legal papers identify two Maryland doctors who investigat­ors say had especially troubling relationsh­ips with the company. The first, Towson-based Dr. Roger Theodore, allegedly had a sexual relationsh­ip with the Insys sales person assigned to him. And company representa­tives continued working with Dr. Eva Dickinson from the Eastern Shore even though they knew she was using the fentanyl spray herself, according to the attorney general’s office.

Neither doctor is accused of any crimes or violations in the attorney general’s action against Insys.

Peter McDowell, an attorney for Theodore, said the doctor did have a romantic relationsh­ip with an Insys employee but that no prescripti­ons were written based on the relationsh­ip. McDowell said Theodore prescribed Subsys to about 40 patients between 2013 and 2016 and that the prescripti­ons “were medically necessary, reasonable and appropriat­e.”

Dickinson could not immediatel­y be reached for comment.

Theodore is currently on probation with the Maryland State Board of Physicians after the panel found problems in May with how he treated pain patients, according to state records. Dickinson pleaded guilty last September to a misdemeano­r drug charge and received probation after Maryland State Police found a marijuana growing operation at her home, according to state records. The state board stripped her of her license to practice medicine in August 2017.

Despite its recruitmen­t of doctors, Insys initially found that insurance companies refused to cover the cost of the prescripti­ons. In response, the state alleges, the company created a unit to deceive insurers about why the drug was being prescribed. Insys allegedly directed company employees to pose as staff from doctors’ offices and sometimes invent cancer diagnoses to fool insurers.

 ??  ??
 ?? KARL MERTON FERRON/BALTIMORE SUN ??
KARL MERTON FERRON/BALTIMORE SUN

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States