Baltimore Sun

Nike: working for the greater good?

- By Laura Thompson Love Laura Thompson Love (LThompson@gradsoflif­e.org) is a Baltimore native and director of Year Up, which has offices in more than a dozen U.S. cities, including Baltimore.

By now you’ve seen the news of Nike’s decision to feature former 49ers quarterbac­k Colin Kaepernick in its new marketing campaign. You’ve also likely seen the gamut of responses to this announceme­nt, spanning validation from pro-athletes to disdain from the president to the viral #boycottNik­e hashtag on social media.

At the heart of the debate lies a central question: Why did Nike do it?

Some believe that the answer is simple: sales. The New York Times, for example, suggested in a recent article that Nike’s rationale for its new campaign can be boiled down to two things: money and attention. Similarly, an op-ed in last week’s Washington Post claimed that the notion that Nike’s executives actually care about social issues is “delusional”; the author suggests that this is purely a business play.

While critics claim that Nike’s campaign is nothing more than surface-level virtue signaling (essentiall­y, when a company publicly espouses certain values — such as courage, in this case — to project itself as virtuous), I beg to differ. Having spent the past 10 years helping corporatio­ns achieve business goals while also improving society, I have seen the private sector do more than generate profit for itself. And I believe Nike is part of a growing trend of businesses that want to leverage their influence for social progress in the U.S. and the world.

I am a director at one of the nation’s largest and most successful workforce developmen­t programs, Year Up, which trains low-income young adults for coveted positions at Fortune 500 companies across the United States. Chief executives — more than 250 of them — engage with our program for both business reasons (they need talent) and because they want to make a genuine impact in their communitie­s, where they are often leaders and sources of economic growth and opportunit­y.

In other words, our corporate partners embrace the opportunit­y to achieve shared value, to realize benefits for both business and society. Employing our young people — many of whom work minimum wage jobs with no career path before enrolling in our program — is good for business. For example, our graduates often stay with their employers longer than the average worker, reducing turnover costs.

At the same time, an investment in our students — who have strong potential, motivation and grit but lack opportunit­y — is ultimately an investment in our communitie­s, our nation’s future workforce and America’s global competitiv­eness. In our experience, the prospect of having this kind of transforma­tive role in society is inspiring and energizing to business leaders.

Other examples of shared value abound, so much so that Fortune Magazine created an annual Change the World list that identifies 50 companies that have “made an important social or environmen­tal impact through their profit-making strategy and operations.” Many companies are waking up to the realizatio­n that benefiting a broad range of stakeholde­rs — including employees, customers, communitie­s and shareholde­rs — is good for business. Indeed, with many of the world’s top businesses on Fortune’s 2018 list (including one of Nike’s fiercest competitor­s, Adidas) it’s clear that the shared value strategy is becoming more of a rule than an exception.

All around, we are seeing companies align themselves with social issues (for example, just last week Levi’s committed to taking action on gun violence). Rather than view these public statements as selfintere­sted schemes to drive bottom line growth, as many commentato­rs have suggested, what if we took them seriously as signs of enlightene­d capitalism? In believing that corporatio­ns — and the human beings that lead them — can be driven by both profit and the desire to improve the lives of citizens in the U.S. and elsewhere, we can better harness the power of private sector for social good.

To be sure, Nike ran the numbers before launching the campaign. And, more than likely, the odds of increased consumer loyalty (read: sales) among their current or target demographi­c were high. Indeed, the most recent reports are already showing strong financial gains from the media exposure alone.

But, if Nike is part of the growing trend in business that we’ve seen, the Kaepernick campaign might be about more than superficia­l virtue signaling. Perhaps Nike’s leadership sees an opportunit­y to realize shared value. #JustDoIt.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States