Baltimore Sun

State failed to research impact of drug coverage

- Martin Schugam, Owings Mills

Once again, Andrea McDaniels did an excellent job discussing issues relevant to state retirees losing their prescripti­on coverage in her recent article, "Ruling leads Md. to extend retiree drug coverage,” (Oct. 12). While her article informs retirees that we will not lose these benefits in 2019, there is no guarantee what will happen to our prescripti­on drug insurance coverage in 2020 and beyond. If we had been forced onto regular Medicare Part D drug insurance, it would have cost many of us thousands of dollars.

I have the following thoughts regarding our drug insurance benefits. First, at a minimum current state retirees should never lose these benefits. I believe that losing these benefits is a breach of contract and age discrimina­tion. In addition, the legislativ­e decision process resulting in our losing these benefits was flawed: Retirees were never made adequately aware that the legislatio­n was being considered and as a result, we were robbed of the opportunit­y to inform our elected representa­tives of our concerns. This is contrary to our civil rights of open government and due process.

Second, it does not seem that an adequate cost analysis was performed to assess the negative impact of this policy on retirees. Some retirees might have to cut other necessary expenses such as food to pay for their drugs or would no longer be able to afford certain drugs due to their cost. To date, Democrats have accused Republican­s of such treachery regarding removing necessary health care insurance. The Democratic leadership trying to rob state retirees of a crucial health benefit is inconsiste­nt with their alleged concern to provide citizens with health care.

If the state must cut expenses by eliminatin­g the drug insurance coverage, it should limit its focus and action to new job applicants or, if necessary, also include employees who have not worked for the state more than a specified period of time and are not vested. And, in a timely manner, the state should inform employees they will be losing their drug coverage.

Finally, I would like to see the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the American Associatio­n of Retired Persons work together with the state to find a fair manner of addressing any change in the drug insurance program that would not penalize retirees.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States