Baltimore Sun

Source: Loh upset regents

President reportedly ignored Frosh’s office’s advice in McNair case

- By Talia Richman

University of Maryland, College Park President Wallace Loh’s decision to take “legal and moral responsibi­lity” for mistakes made in treating 19-year-old football player Jordan McNair went against advice from the attorney general’s office, according to a source with knowledge of the proceeding­s.

Instead, Loh stood before a sea of cameras and microphone­s during an Aug. 14 news conference and apologized, saying the university took ownership for mistakes athletic training staff made on the day McNair suffered the heatstroke that would ultimately kill him.

Loh’s announceme­nt — which came roughly two months after McNair died and four days after ESPN published an explosive article about the football team’s culture — was a turning point in the scandal that’s overtaken the state’s flagship university, and it helped catalyze a series of consequent­ial moves.

Three days after his statement, the University System of Maryland’s governing body would assume control of investigat­ions into the football team. The Board of Regents would then push Loh to retire, while insisting he reinstate DJ Durkin, the Jordan McNair

embattled football coach. Loh would agree to do so, but end up firing Durkin anyway. Regents Chair James Brady would resign in the wake of intense public pressure.

To many, accepting responsibi­lity was a sign of courage that illustrate­d Loh understood the magnitude of McNair’s death. Sharing this belief: the McNair family and a number of Prince George’s County officials.

But to shocked members of the Board of Regents, it contribute­d to the lack of trust between the president and the board that oversees him — and a sense that he regarded his relationsh­ip with the governing body too cavalierly.

Raquel Coombs, director of communicat­ions for the Maryland attorney general’s office, said the “office does not discuss advice we may or may not have given to a client.”

A different source close to the situation described it this way: Loh called Attorney General Brian Frosh ahead of the news conference, walked him through his plan and was told, “You are the client,” which the source said could be interprete­d in a number of ways.

The attorney general’s office is representi­ng the University of Maryland and the university system on all legal claims related to McNair’s death. The teenager’s parents are being represente­d by the prominent Baltimore firm Murphy, Falcon & Murphy, whose lawyers are the architects behind numerous high-profile, high-dollar settlement­s.

University officials declined to make Loh available for an interview to discuss his decisions surroundin­g the McNair tragedy.

A separate source familiar with the situation said that by the time of the news conference, Loh had been briefed on enough informatio­n to understand that the university’s trainers had not effectivel­y treated McNair on May 29 and felt he had to take responsibi­lity.

Loh’s supporters cite his performanc­e at the Aug. 14 news conference as a reason they support his leadership and hope he’ll rescind his retirement.

Prince George’s County Executive Rushern Baker said Loh bravely went down the right path by “taking a stand, knowing that there would be repercussi­ons.” Baker said Loh’s decision to take responsibi­lity struck a chord with many people, including him, and calmed a volatile situation on campus.

“As county executive, we run into these incidents all the time with police officers and firefighte­rs,” he said. “Usually what we’re counseled to do is to wait until everything is in — don’t say anything that could implicate the county. That’s the instinct from the legal community.”

Loh instead “took the moral high ground,” Baker said, and sent a message that McNair’s life was valued.

It meant a great deal to McNair’s parents, too.

“Jordan’s parents think, and we think as well, that in the aftermath of the board’s horrible decision, Wallace Loh has acted with dignity under fire and tremendous courage,” said attorney Wiliam H. “Billy” Murphy Jr.

But to some regents, according to the first source, those same actions contribute­d to the sense that the board couldn’t trust Loh and had to assume control over the situation. From a liability standpoint, the source said, Loh’s assuming responsibi­lity so quickly and before the investigat­ion into the day’s events had been completed and released put the system in a difficult spot.

There had been previous tensions between Loh and some regents, sources say, including over the renaming of the football stadium in College Park. Brady was one of five people who voted against changing the name of Byrd Stadium in 2015. This went against the wishes of Loh and student activists who said it was insulting to have African-American athletes play in a stadium named for Harry Clifton “Curley” Byrd, a segregatio­nist former university president.

In an interview last month, Brady denied having a “personal vendetta” against Loh.

The decision to take responsibi­lity wouldn’t be the last time during this saga that Loh would go against instructio­ns.

The regents took over two investigat­ions into the College Park football program: One was tasked with reviewing protocols and procedures on the day McNair fell ill and one was commission­ed to evaluate the team’s culture, which ESPN had dubbed “toxioc.”

The first report determined that athletic training staff made a host of errors on the day McNair fell ill — including failing to immerse him in cold water, which experts say is the best practice and could have saved his life. The second determined the football program “fostered a culture where problems festered because too many players feared speaking out.” It delved into two years’ worth of problems within the athletic department, and found it “lacked a culture of accountabi­lity” and was hindered by frequent turnover, dissension and infighting.

The investigat­ions’ results led the board to eventually conclude that the university bears responsibi­lity for what happened to McNair, a system spokesman said.

The regents discussed the investigat­ion results in numerous closed-door meetings. Some felt firing Loh, Durkin and athletic director Damon Evans was the only path forward. After hours of discussion — and in-person meetings where the three men made their cases — they settled on recommenda­tions. The vote was not unanimous. Loh was to retire as the end of the school year. Evans was to keep his job. Durkin — whose impassione­d speech made an impression on the board — was to return to the sidelines after months on administra­tive leave. Sources have told The Baltimore Sun that this went against Loh’s wishes.

During the tense news conference last month when these recommenda­tions were made public, Loh didn’t express confidence in Durkin or mention him by name, but he agreed to go along with the regents’ decisions.

Afterward, there was swift backlash and confusion after reports that Loh had been pushed out while Durkin and Evans kept their high-paying, high-profile jobs: How could a football player die and the president, not the coach, be leaving?

Over the next roughly 24 hours, Loh heard these concerns firsthand in meetings with students, academic leadership and politician­s. And he saw the intense outcry against the regents. Armed with popular sentiment, he made the move he originally wanted to. He defied the board and fired Durkin.

Brady resigned from the board amid the controvers­y.

Some observers look at the timing of his decision and think Loh — who holds a doctorate in psychology from the University of Michigan and a law degree from Yale University — played his cards right to achieve his objectives and end up looking good in the public eye.

State lawmakers had begun preemptive­ly mobilizing in support of Loh even before the regents announced their recommenda­tions, saying he’s been an asset to the state flagship and should not be unfairly scapegoate­d. After last month’s news, their voices only grew louder.

Sen. Jim Rosapepe, an outspoken Loh supporter, said there wasn’t a hidden agenda behind the president’s moves.

“He’s a really straight arrow,” said Rosapepe, who represents College Park. “There’s not crafty politics. He tries to figure out what the right thing to do is and then he does it.”

Rosapepe is among a group of state lawmakers who have called for Loh to rescind his retirement. A prominent donor also asked him to reconsider his departure. Loh has fielded calls, emails and in-person pleas to continue his tenure.

At the same time, the University Senate, a College Park governing body composed of faculty, staff, students and administra­tors, passed a resolution calling for Loh to “honor his previous statement to retire in June of 2019.” Last week, a coalition of roughly two dozen student groups — many representi­ng marginaliz­ed communitie­s on campus — held a rally they dubbed, “Fire the Liars,” and demanded the same commitment.

Loh’s given no public indication of whether he’s reconsider­ing.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States