Baltimore Sun

Hopkins, UM urged to cut ties with ICE

Amid immigratio­n debate, students seek end to contracts with U.S. agency

- By Thalia Juarez

Amid a national debate over immigratio­n policy under the Trump administra­tion, the Johns Hopkins University and the University of Maryland, College Park are some of just a very few universiti­es in the nation that have contracts with Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t.

With protests and petitions, students on the twocampuse­shavebegun­demandingt­he institutio­ns sever ties with ICE — even as administra­tors counter that their work with the agency has nothing to do with detention or deportatio­n of undocument­ed immigrants.

On Thursday, students conducted a public teach-in and rally once again calling on the Johns Hopkins administra­tion to end its contracts with ICE. Students huddled together in the cold outside Brody commons chanting “Endthecont­racts” and “Say it loud; say it clear: Immigrants are welcome here.”

With signs in hand, students walked to the main library together where they dropped an anti-ICE banner from the main balcony, gathering the attention of students studying.

“I think a lot of us just had a moment of reckoning with this, and we realized we had to do something when we learned that our

university was helping to perpetuate this crisis which has real human costs,” said Samantha Agarwal, a fourth-year sociology graduate student at Hopkins, who has served as an organizer for a university coalition against ICE. She and other students argue that the relationsh­ip with a federal agency that they say violates human rights goes against the university’s values.

Since 2008, the university has earned more than $7 million from 37 contracts with ICE, according to government spending data. Hopkins has three contracts with the agency totaling more than $1.7 million. The contracts are primarily with the medical school for educationa­l programs that provide emergency medical training and leadership education, which are set to expire in 2019.

In a petition that amassed nearly 2,000 signatures, faculty, students, staff and alumni urged Johns Hopkins to end its partnershi­p with ICE, immediatel­y. The petition, delivered Sept. 21 to Johns Hopkins President Ronald J. Daniels, stated that supporters did not see “how in good conscience” the university could collaborat­e with the agency “given the extent and extremity of its cruel practices.”

Daniels and Provost Sunil Kumar responded Oct. 17, stating in a letter that it would be wrong to terminate the contracts, on the grounds that the university has a commitment to the principle of academic freedom.

“We believe that it would be antithetic­al to the mission of the university if we were to insist that faculty members withhold instructio­n or medical care in order to have the university express its disapprova­l with certain aspects of current federal policy,” the letter read.

Students fired back Monday, arguing that the training the university provides enables human rights abuses.

In response to inquiries from The Baltimore Sun, the university pointed to the statement it provided to students. Officials did not respond to follow-up questions about whether they planned to renew the contracts.

While Agarwal says they recognize mass deportatio­ns didn’t start with the Trump administra­tion, she and others were catalyzed to act after increased media attention shed light on the conditions within ICE detention centers.

Officials at ICE said the agency has awarded roughly 200 unique contracts to entities under the label “education institutio­n” and highlighte­d that the work they do is in compliance with federal law and agency policy.

“We focus our resources on aliens who pose a threat to public safety and national security, as the enforcemen­t data makes clear,” said ICE spokesman Matthew Bourke.

In addition to deportatio­ns, the agency’s criminal investigat­ive unit rescued andidentif­ied 904 children who were victims of sexual exploitati­on, said Bourke.

Johns Hopkins and the University of Maryland are among six institutio­ns of higher education that have contracts with ICE. The others are Virginia Tech, Northeaste­rn University in Boston, University of Alabama Birmingham and Vermont State Colleges System.

In College Park, students demanding that the University of Maryland end its contract with ICE have joined in the call for a leadership overhaul at the university. Political Latinxs United for Movement and Action in Society (PLUMAS) were among 24 student groups taking part in a rally last week calling for President Wallace Loh to fulfill his stated intention to retire in June.

Blanca Arriola Palma, the president of PLUMAS, said the only way they see the university addressing this issue is if there’s a change in leadership overall.

“This is whywe’re pushing for institutio­nal change,” she said. “We need a form of change that will have an everlastin­g impact for future students.”

The university has an active contract with the Homeland Security Investigat­ions division of ICE. The $625,000 award was for the university’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) to provide cultural competency and counterter­rorism training to homeland security agents who are stationed at embassies abroad and work on counterter­rorism investigat­ions, according to university spokeswoma­n Jessica Jennings.

Bill Braniff, director of START, said he has made it START’s mission to ensure they are providing objective and research-based analysis to the profession­al counterter­rorism community.

“The training that START is providing … is entirely unrelated to the immigratio­n debate. While I’m very empathetic of concern of students, I hear them and understand them, it would be counterpro­ductive for us to stop doing good empirical counter-terrorism training,” said Braniff.

In a congressio­nal hearing before the Committee on Homeland Security last year, START researcher­s presented some of their findings, which showed that terrorism in the U.S. is not uniquely linked to Muslim extremism nor to immigrants.

Braniff said that removing that sort of work from the classroom and profession­al discourse among counterter­rorism officials actually does a disservice to immigrants in this country.

“We are not training the enforcemen­t and removal division. It has nothing to do with that. But, weareengag­ingwithcou­nterterror­ism profession­als in a meaningful, thoughtful discussion on terrorism. And that is our mission.”

In response to inquiries from The Sun, the university pointed to an FAQ officials crafted this semester after queries from students and media.

On whether they plan to enter into any future contracts with ICE the university said in the FAQ that without their involvemen­t, contracts like the one they have could be awarded to groups with a clear political agenda.

“As a public research institutio­n, it is our mission to advance knowledge in areas of importance to the state, the nation, and the world using research-based, data-driven and nonpartisa­n methods. This includes working with a variety of federal agencies,” the FAQ answers on why the university provides training to ICE.

With the university labeling this the “Year of Immigratio­n,” Palma said she and other students were appalled when they learned through media reports that her school had a relationsh­ip with ICE.

“We don’t understand why the university would want to be associated with an institutio­n that has been part of cruel actions towards families, people and immigrant communitie­s. Especially knowing they have undocument­ed students on campus,” said Palma. “It doesn’t matter what the contracts are about.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States