Baltimore Sun

List of maglev station sites reduced

Federal regulators narrow choice of possible locations in Baltimore, Washington

- By Kevin Rector krector@baltsun.com twitter.com/rectorsun

Federal regulators considerin­g the proposed magnetic levitation or “maglev” train between Washington and Baltimore — which backers say could cut travel between the two cities to 15 minutes — have narrowed the list of potential station locations in both cities.

In Baltimore, a potential station in Port Covington is no longer being considered, while an undergroun­d station near Oriole Park at Camden Yards and an above-ground station in Cherry Hill, near Westport, remain in the running.

The station near Camden Yards would benefit from its central location, but its constructi­on could require the demolition of several buildings and disrupt traffic temporaril­y, the report found. A station in Cherry Hill would be substantia­lly cheaper, but riders would have to catch shuttles or light rail trains to get to downtown — potentiall­y doubling their travel time from Washington, it found.

The proposed train line, which also would stop at BWI Marshall airport, is backed by Baltimore Washington Rapid Rail, or BWRR, a local railroad company formed to operate the maglev were it built.

The company says its technology, which was developed by the Japanese government and the private Central Japan Railway Co., could transport travelers between Wash- ington and Baltimore in 15 minutes — and eventually from Washington to NewYork in an hour.

Building the first leg of maglev between Washington and Baltimore would cost between $12 billion and $15 billion, and could be paid for through a mix of Japanese loans, U.S. federal grants and loans, and private investment, the company said. Fares would be competitiv­e with those for Amtrak’s Acela service, the company said.

Wayne Rogers, chairman and CEO of BWRR, said a major takeaway of the report is that “the project continues to proceed forward, incorporat­ing at each step the comments of agencies and the public.”

“Residents should feel good that their comments are being both reviewed and, if appropriat­e, incorporat­ed,” he said.

The new report, published online Thursday, is the latest to provide input on the project from the Federal Railroad Administra­tion and the Maryland Department of Transporta­tion, which are overseeing a $28 million federal review of the proposal under the National Environmen­tal Policy Act.

The report found that the proposed undergroun­d station near Camden Yards would be near transit connection­s and parking garages, in a downtown location and accessible by local highways. But it acknowledg­ed that building the station wouldn’t be easy.

“A station location in Camden Yards is in an area with heavy traffic and would require temporary traffic disruption­s during constructi­on,” the report found. “The proposed station alignment does not follow the street grid; therefore if top-down constructi­on were selected, then several buildings (over the span of approximat­ely three blocks) would be demolished.”

The report also found that constructi­on of a “deep undergroun­d station and its approach tunnel” in the area “would require temporary or permanent underpinni­ng support” for M&T Bank Stadium, the Baltimore Convention Center and other buildings and pieces of highway infrastruc­ture.

It also found that there would be “a potential adverse effect” on the Old Otterbein United Methodist Church, an historic landmark near Camden Yards.

The report also found an above-ground station near the light rail station in Cherry Hill would be in an existing transit-oriented developmen­t zone with “redevelopm­ent potential,” and accessible to the highway system. It also found that building such a station would cost $1.4 billion less than building the undergroun­d station near Camden Yards.

The site is 2.5 miles from downtown, and the report estimated shuttles could be provided to get people who arrive at the Cherry Hill station into downtown within 18 minutes — making that connection more time-consuming than the entire maglev trip from Washington. Travelers also could take light rail trains, which arrive about every 15 minutes and take 7 to 8 minutes to get downtown, the report found.

The report said undergroun­d stations considered in the Westport-Cherry Hill area were not viable, and removed them from considerat­ion along with a potential undergroun­d station near Charles and Light streets.

Port Covington was removed as an option as well, in part because other developmen­t is moving forward in the area and expected to be completed by 2020.

Port Covington is the brainchild of Under Armour founder and CEO Kevin Plank, who also sits on the board of The Northeast Maglev, a company that along with BWRR is promoting building the maglev.

Marc Weller, founding partner of Weller Developmen­t Co., which is developing Port Covington, said he remained “very excited" about the potential for the train in Baltimore.

The new report also narrowed the list of potential station locations in Washington, to two, both in the Mount Vernon Square area downtown. It vetoed a location in the city’s NoMa neighborho­od.

The federal review process had previously narrowed a list of more than a dozen potential routes for the line between the two cities down to two. The latest report leaves both of those options on the table, for further review.

Both routes would be more than twothirds tunnel and follow the Route 295 corridor. One route would be on the east side of the parkway, the other on the west side. Each would run on elevated tracks between Hanover and Greenbelt.

The Baltimore Sun published an extensive look at the project proposal and a related project in Japan last month.

The new report is not the last step in the review process.

Adraft Environmen­tal Impact Statement is expected to identify a preferred route next year. The public will have an opportunit­y to comment. The FRA is expected to issue a final report saying whether the line should be built by 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States