Baltimore Sun

Let Mueller finish the job

All we want for Christmas is a brief reprieve from overwrough­t speculatio­n

-

Our view:

It is just a matter of time before the American Psychiatri­c Associatio­n or some other august group of mental health experts defines a new distinctly American illness: RSMCF, or Robert S. Mueller Chronic Fatigue, also known as the Muellerovi­rus. With each court filing, each witness or defense counsel leak, and each “Witch Hunt” overreacti­on on the @realDonald­Trump Twitter feed, the public is drawn into daily soap opera drama and speculatio­n that, whether one is a fan of the 45th president or repulsed by him, can be a tiring and confusing exercise.

This past weekend was a classic example, not just of incrementa­l advancemen­t in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election, with its growing list of tawdry misadventu­res by some in the Trump inner circle, but of breathless speculatio­n on cable television and other media venues over whether the president might actually do time in prison. And here some Democrats claimed it was too early to talk about impeachmen­t.

Don’t misunderst­and. There is an important process going on, an investigat­ion with serious implicatio­ns and a democracy to preserve. But when court filings related to Michael D. Cohen’s sentencing mention hush money payments to two women and then note those payments were allegedly directed by thencandid­ate Donald Trump, it’s still a bit of a leap to be measuring the president for prison garb. That both Mr. Mueller and the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York are looking closely at those payments to Karen McDougal and Stephanie “Stormy Daniels” Clifford, with whom Mr. Trump allegedly had affairs, is noteworthy but hardly conclusive.

And, of course, this wouldn’t be the first time that some little keyhole-size view of the Mueller probe was parsed and speculated into something, as Mr. Trump might say, yuge. Media speculatio­n isn’t a crime, of course, but it gives Mr. Trump and his supporters an opportunit­y to give their own hyper-extended defense. That includes the president’s Saturday tweets disparagin­g the “collusion illusion” and asserting that “there is nothing impeachabl­e here.”

Why must everything related to the special counsel’s investigat­ion be treated as schoolyard gossip? That’s easy. Because it serves a purpose for all involved. Cable networks get easy ratings, the president’s critics get face time attacking him, and Mr. Trump and his supporters get to deflect, deflect, deflect. And it’s not hard to cover — most all the players are all a phone call away, and, even if Mr. Mueller stays mum, reporters know plenty of insiders who love to talk. The big losers are the rest of us who find the whole miserable thing nauseating and depressing.

Here’s an idea. Why don’t we let the Mueller probe run its course and then figure out the proper remedy and reaction? We realize that high-profile public inquiries never work out this way. (Watergate was a drip-drip of informatio­n in the press long before Senate hearings or Richard Nixon’s tapes were released). But maybe for the holidays, we could all declare a moratorium on scrutinizi­ng the Justice Department’s scrutinize­rs and adopt more of a wait-and-see approach. After all, this isn’t ending any time soon. With Democratic control of the House, a lot more subpoenas are headed to the White House — including into Mr. Trump’s personal finances. Whether there’s a “smoking gun” now isn’t especially definitive given the amount of sniffing for firearms that’s headed our way.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States