Baltimore Sun

Bundy may not be staying

Trading pitcher could bring decent return to aid rebuild

- By Jon Meoli

Even for a front office that has largely followed through on its pledge one year ago to be open and transparen­t on what it planned to do to make the Orioles into a viable and sustainabl­e competitor, the words were striking.

On his conference call Monday to address the team’s moves at the contractte­nder deadline for arbitratio­n-eligible players, which featured the team avoiding arbitratio­n with Richard Bleier and trading infielder Jonathan Villar to the Miami Marlins, executive vice president/general manager Mike Elias was asked about the status of right-hander Dylan Bundy.

A week ago, MLB.com reported there was momentum toward a trade of Bundy, who has two years of club control left and is owed a projected $5.7 million in arbitratio­n this year. And while nothing came to fruition before Thanksgivi­ng, Elias certainly didn’t declare the Orioles’ longest-tenured starter off limits.

“Dylan’s a really good starting pitcher,

[he] had a good year for us, took a step forward for us and has a lot of potential,” Elias said. “He’s got four pitches, he strikes out a lot of hitters — he’s as good a competitor as there is out there.

“There are a lot of teams looking for pitching right now, so he’s a popular guy in that respect. As I’ve said all along, we have conversati­ons about any of our players on the major-league roster. That’s just where we’re at right now as an organizati­on, and his is a name that I hear often. But until a trade is done, or if it ever comes, he’s a part of our team, part of our rotation, and we look forward to seeing him in Sarasota.”

Contrast that to what Elias has said in the past about Trey Mancini, another homegrown talent who has years of club control left and is someone Elias has frequently said the team could build around. The Bundy answer sounds more like an advertisem­ent.

To be fair, Elias likely doesn’t have to drum up much of a market for someone such as Bundy, even if the shine of a player who was once the top prospect in all of baseball has largely worn off. Bundy cut down on the home runs he allowed in 2019 en route to a bit of a bounce-back year, finishing with a 4.79 ERA and slightly better peripheral­s that had essentiall­y made him a league-average pitcher.

While pitcher wins above replacemen­t is far from the best measure, he was worth 2.5 WAR according to FanGraphs in 2019, and only eight free-agent starting pitchers were better. Two years of Bundy at $14 million or $15 million for his age-27 and 28 seasons, before he hits free agency, is a lower-risk and lower-reward propositio­n than guaranteei­ng at least that much on a per-year basis to a pitcher in his 30s, which is what signing any of those eight pitchers would be doing.

There’s also a legitimate question about which Bundy an acquiring team would be getting. His durability isn’t a question. He’s made at least 28 starts in each of the last three seasons, and some of his so-so results would probably be better if he didn’t pitch through the things he has to make that the case.

This year, the Orioles made breakthrou­ghs in getting Bundy to use his homer-prone fastball less and work as a four-pitch pitcher. He said at the end of the season that he looked to Zack Grienke, another former hard thrower who has learned to use all of his pitches in any count, as an example of how to go forward with his present-day arsenal. Yankees starter Masahiro Tanaka would be another example at whom Bundy could look.

Bundy’s slider is still a legitimate strikeout pitch, and he spent all of 2019 working his curveball and changeup into being reliable pitches again.

When he first broke into the majors full time and had arguably his best season in 2016, Bundy didn’t use his slider; his fastball-curveball-changeup mix was more than enough. It stands to reason that another year of commitment to pitching that way could lead to further improvemen­t, meaning Elias’ proclamati­on that Bundy has a lot of potential could end up being the case.

Like the Villar trade, it’s not as if the Orioles are brimming with options to replace Bundy. Another possible challenge to trading Bundy, who could pitch for the Orioles for two more years before free agency, would be that Elias would have to ask for more than lottery tickets in their first profession­al season, as he did for Andrew Cashner with the two Venezuelan teenagers acquired from the Boston Red Sox, or the first-year profession­al pitcher he got from the Marlins for Villar.

Trading Bundy would require a more substantia­l haul. At least one player who will slide into the team’s top-30 prospects would be the starting point.

It’s a different trade than the Orioles have executed to this point under Elias. But given the overwhelmi­ng data growing to show this team is more than willing to cut payroll and present-day talent in the name of building up their farm system for a possible contender down the line, Bundy could be the next player set to leave this rebuild behind.

 ?? JOHN MCCOY/GETTY ?? Pitcher Dylan Bundy won’t be a free agent for two more years, but the Orioles might look to use him as a trade piece.
JOHN MCCOY/GETTY Pitcher Dylan Bundy won’t be a free agent for two more years, but the Orioles might look to use him as a trade piece.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States