Baltimore Sun

NATO downplays alliance’s divisions

Summit ends with commitment to mutual defense

- By Lorne Cook and Jill Lawless

WATFORD, England — NATO leaders sought Wednesday to paper over difference­s like the military alliance’s future priorities but insisted they would respond as one in the event of an attack on any of the 29 member countries.

Ending a summit just north of London to mark NATO’s 70th anniversar­y, the leaders announced that they would set up a commission of experts to study political decision-making. That appears to be a direct response to French President Emmanuel Macron’s recent lament about the “brain death” of the transAtlan­tic alliance.

“We stand together, all for one and one for all,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenber­g told reporters after chairing the meeting at a luxury hotel and golf resort. “Our commitment to Article 5, the collective defense clause of our alliance, is ironclad.”

Ahead of the summit, Macron had complained about a lack of U.S. leadership. President Donald Trump branded his remarks as “very disrespect­ful,” while Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggested that Macron himself was “brain dead.”

The infighting is mostly due to Turkey’s offensive in northern Syria, which began in October.

Macron has complained that Trump pulled U.S. troops out of the region without warning his NATO allies; a move that Turkey saw as a green light to send its troops in.

Countries across the European Union are particular­ly concerned as to what may transpire. The worry in many EU capitals is that some extremist fighters escaped during Turkey’s offensive, and that the fighting could spark a new wave of refugees.

To help ease tensions, leaders agreed to “a forwarding-looking reflection process” to be led by Stoltenber­g.

Details were sketchy, but the commission, “drawing on relevant expertise,” would study ways “to further strengthen NATO’s political dimension including consultati­on.”

Germany and France had both put forward similar schemes, although Macron riled many allies with his pre-summit remarks and NATO officials have pointedly suggested that they were more impressed by Berlin’s proposal.

After three summits in consecutiv­e years, the leaders decided that they would take a year off and meet again in 2021. That means there won’t be another one until after the next presidenti­al election in the United States, which is by far NATO’s most powerful and influentia­l member country.

Summit host Prime Minister Boris Johnson — also busy with a divisive British election campaign — was upbeat, saying “there was a mood of very great solidarity and determinat­ion and a willingnes­s to push NATO forward, not just for the next few years but for the next 70 years.”

There were a few sour notes though.

Erdogan didn’t speak to waiting media. Trump arrived via a different entrance, away from media, and said he would leave after canceling a news conference.

Trump took off for Washington as the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachmen­t hearing was underway.

Though his conduct here fit his pattern of disruption at internatio­nal summits, Trump did not make the fiery threats that have punctuated previous gatherings. NATO leaders were almost giddy as they survived another encounter with Trump with t heir alliance i ntact. Trump’s canceled news conference, eliminatin­g one last chance for him to take aim at them, was to many the departure gift.

Trump’s visit to the NATO summit was erratic. The president, who has long criticized the 70-yearold alliance, at times this week cast himself as its defender, while at other moments chastised allies for, in his view, taking advantage of the United States.

Inside a closed-door session, Trump read a statement to his fellow leaders listing off grievances about military spending. But he did not threaten other countries in the same way he had done in previous NATO meetings, according to five NATOdiplom­ats and policymake­rs who were either inside the room or listened to the conversati­on from a separate chamber.

“There were no threats. It wasn’t like last time,” said one policymake­r, who, like others, spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the closed- door meeting. Trump “always prefers to have a tough image, but he fell in with the general effort to portray what’s happening as a success,” the official added.

Trump also called Prime Minister Justin Trudeau “two-faced” after a video emerged showing the Canadian leader apparently gossiping about Trump.

Macron refused to apologize for his remarks, saying they had ignited a debate at NATO about important strategic issues.

“When there’s ice, icebreaker ships are needed. It makes some loud noise, but it opens the path,” he said.

He said NATO “debates should be about other things than budgets and finances.”

Stoltenber­g noted that European allies and Canada have added $130 billion to their military spending since 2016, even as Trump has complained that they are too slow to boost their military budgets.

“This is unpreceden­ted, this is making us stronger,” Stoltenber­g said of the spending effort.

The Washington Post contribute­d.

 ?? NICHOLAS KAMM/GETTY-AFP ?? Secretary-General Jens Stoltenber­g, left, looks on as President Trump speaks during a working lunch at NATO’s summit.
NICHOLAS KAMM/GETTY-AFP Secretary-General Jens Stoltenber­g, left, looks on as President Trump speaks during a working lunch at NATO’s summit.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States