Baltimore Sun

Pa. court reverses Cosby’s conviction

Comedian released, shouldn’t have been charged, justices say

- By Maryclaire Dale

PHILADELPH­IA — Pennsylvan­ia’s highest court threw out Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction and released him from prison Wednesday in a stunning reversal of fortune for the comedian once known as “America’s Dad,” ruling that the prosecutor who brought the case was bound by his predecesso­r’s agreement not to charge Cosby.

Cosby, 83, flashed the V-for-victory sign to a helicopter overhead as he trudged into his suburban Philadelph­ia home after serving nearly three years of a three- to 10-year sentence for drugging and violating Temple University sports administra­tor Andrea Constand in 2004.

The former “Cosby Show” star — the first celebrity tried and convicted in the #MeToo era — had no comment as he arrived, and just smiled and nodded later at a news conference outside, where his lawyer Jennifer Bonjean said: “We are thrilled to have Mr. Cosby home.”

“He served three years of an unjust sentence and he did it with dignity and principle,” she added.

In a statement, Constand and her lawyers called the ruling disappoint­ing, and they, like many other advocates, expressed fear that it could discourage sexual assault victims from coming forward.

“We urge all victims to have their voices heard,” they added.

Cosby was arrested in 2015, when a district attorney armed with newly unsealed evidence — the comic’s damaging deposition in a lawsuit brought by Constand — filed charges against him just days before the 12-year statute of limitation­s was about to run out.

But the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court said Wednesday that District Attorney Kevin Steele, who made the decision to arrest Cosby, was obligated to stand by his predecesso­r’s promise not to charge Cosby, though there was no evidence that agreement was ever put in writing.

Justice David Wecht, writing for a split court, said Cosby had relied on the previous district attorney’s decision not to charge him when the comedian gave his potentiall­y incriminat­ing testimony in Constand’s civil case. The court called Cosby’s subsequent arrest “an affront to fundamenta­l fairness, particular­ly when it results in a criminal prosecutio­n that was forgone for more than a decade.”

It said justice and “fair play and decency” require that the district attorney’s office stand by the decision of the previous DA.

The justices said that overturnin­g the conviction and barring any further prosecutio­n “is the only remedy that comports with society’s reasonable expectatio­ns of its elected prosecutor­s and our criminal justice system.”

As Cosby was promptly set free from the state prison in suburban Montgomery County and driven home, Bonjean said he should never have been charged.

“District attorneys can’t change it up simply because of their political motivation,” she said, adding that Cosby remains in excellent health, apart from being legally blind.

In a statement, Steele said Cosby went free “on a procedural issue that is irrelevant to the facts of the crime.”

He commended Constand for coming forward and added: “My hope is that this decision will not dampen the reporting of sexual assaults by victims.”

Constand and her lawyer did not immediatel­y return messages seeking comment.

“FINALLY !!!! A terrible wrong is being righted — a miscarriag­e of justice is corrected!” the actor’s “Cosby Show” co-star Phylicia Rashad tweeted.

“I am furious to hear this news,” actor Amber Tamblyn, a founder of Time’s Up, an advocacy group for victims of sexual assault, said on Twitter. “I personally know women who this man drugged and raped while unconsciou­s. Shame on the court and this decision.”

Four Supreme Court justices formed the majority that ruled in Cosby’s favor, while three others dissented in whole or in part.

Peter Goldberger, a suburban Philadelph­ia lawyer with an expertise in criminal appeals, said prosecutor­s could ask the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court for reargument or reconsider­ation, but it would be a long shot.

“I can’t imagine that with such a lengthy opinion, with a thoughtful concurring opinion and a thoughtful dissenting opinion, that you could honestly say they made a simple mistake that would change their minds if they point it out to them,” Goldberger said.

Even though Cosby was charged only with the assault on Constand, the judge at his trial allowed five other accusers to testify that they were similarly victimized by Cosby in the 1980s. Prosecutor­s called them as witnesses to establish what they said was a pattern of behavior on Cosby’s part.

Cosby’s lawyers had argued on appeal that the use of the five additional accusers was improper. But the Pennsylvan­ia high court did not weigh in on the question, saying it was moot, given the finding that Cosby should not have been prosecuted in the first place.

In sentencing Cosby, the trial judge had ruled him a sexually violent predator who could not be safely allowed out in public and needed to report to authoritie­s for the rest of his life. The AP does not typically identify sexual assault victims without their permission, which Constand has granted.

 ??  ?? Cosby
Cosby

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States