Baltimore Sun

And now the Taliban is at war with itself

- By Jacob N. Shapiro Jacob N. Shapiro ( jns@princeton.edu) is a professor of politics and internatio­nal affairs at Princeton University and managing director of the Empirical Studies of Conflict Project. He is the author of “The Terrorist’s Dilemma: Managi

Thursday’s horrific suicide bombings outside the Kabul airport, which killed 13 American service members and scores of Afghans, bring two facts into stark relief.

First, the Taliban will face challenges from more extreme groups. Second, the Taliban is divided. The attackers upended the aura of control the group’s leaders want to present to the world. In all likelihood, they made it through multiple Taliban checkpoint­s to pull off the attack.

Indeed, there is a new battle taking shape in Afghanista­n — this one within the Taliban political movement.

On one side are senior leaders who understand the organizati­on desperatel­y needs foreign assistance if they wish to remain in power for more than a few months. The government is staring at economic collapse. It will lose more than $3 billion a year in support if all pledged internatio­nal aid is withdrawn. Meanwhile, the Taliban lacks access to the $9 billion in the Afghan central bank’s reserves, most of which is controlled by the U.S. and internatio­nal institutio­ns, and is already facing galloping inflation.

The Taliban’s $300 million to $1.6 billion in revenue from the opium trade won’t go far to meet the government’s $5.5-billion annual budget, especially as it faces a new insurgency and unrest in many areas of the country. Though increasing taxes on legal trade is certainly possible in the short run, doing so will make an already dire economic situation even worse. Stranded funds and limited alternativ­es create powerful pressures to moderate. Even leaving aside the Taliban’s desperate need for internatio­nal assistance and access to cash reserves, the group’s 80,000 fighters cannot control a country of 38 million people without making some accommodat­ions. That’s why many Taliban leaders are making public statements about moderating policies toward women, respecting human rights and providing amnesty to those who worked for the government.

At the same time, Afghans seeking to leave are being beaten and sometimes killed. The Taliban’s stated policies were not followed at airport checkpoint­s, even before the announceme­nt that Afghans would not be allowed to leave. Taliban squads are going house to house searching for those who worked for the government. And activists for the Hazara ethnic minority are being hunted and killed in Ghazni province and Kabul.

Like any political movement, the Taliban has long contained diverse factions. Senior leaders such as Abdul Ghani Baradar, who oversees the organizati­on’s political affairs and met with CIA Director William Burns this week, have to strike a balance between different constituen­cies.And that creates challenges, because the Taliban’s hard-line fighters do not want to moderate. From their perspectiv­e, the group just won an enormous victory against the internatio­nal community, one that proves the strength of their ideology. They want to settle scores and govern according to a set of fundamenta­list principles that do not allow women to participat­e in public life or any form of democracy. Little is known about

Mr. Baradar’s approach, but Mohammad Yaqoob, the military chief, and jurist Abdul Hakim, who led the group’s negotiatin­g team in Qatar, are believed to favor a pragmatic path. But another prominent military leader, Sirajuddin Haqqani, whose terrorist network has long been subject to United Nations sanctions, is considered more extreme. The Taliban supreme commander, Haibatulla­h Akhundzada, reportedly separated control of the military between Mr. Yaqoob and Mr. Haqqani, both deputy supreme commanders, to prevent clashes.

What happens next in Afghanista­n depends on who has the majority inside the Taliban movement — the leaders cannot go against the majority without risking their own lives.

If the moderates have the majority, they may be able to slowly rein in the terrible abuses we are now seeing and negotiate with the country’s existing political elites to form a stable government. But if the extremists have the majority, the organizati­on will not moderate, foreign aid will not flow, and the economy will collapse. Local militias will resist efforts to centralize power, as they have done for centuries. As extremists target ethnic minorities and modern lifestyles, more people will fight back, and it will take fewer financial resources for insurgents and outside powers to start new rebellions.

And the Taliban will soon lose control over large parts of the country. Given that Taliban rank-and-file fighters are likely to be drawn from conservati­ve rural areas and that those who have been imprisoned by the Afghan government will probably win prominent roles, I fear extremists will hold the majority. And that will mean no moderation, little aid, an inexorable slide into another round of fighting, and eventually a government with little power outside the Pashtun heartland where it has the most legitimacy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States