Baltimore Sun

House votes to guarantee women’s abortion rights

- By Mary Clare Jalonick and Lisa Mascaro

WASHINGTON — The House passed legislatio­n Friday that would guarantee a woman’s right to an abortion, an effort by Democrats to circumvent a new Texas law that has placed that access under threat.

The bill’s 218-211 approval is mostly symbolic, as Republican opposition will doom it in the Senate.

Still, Democrats say they are doing all they can to codify the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision after the Supreme Court recently allowed the Texas law banning most abortions in the state to take effect. The court will hear arguments in December in a separate Mississipp­i bid to overturn the landmark decision.

Despite the long odds in his chamber, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement after the vote that “Congress must assert its role to protect the constituti­onal right to abortion” and that the Senate would hold a vote “in the very near future.”

Codifying the Roe ruling would mean creating a right to abortion in federal law, a monumental change that would make it harder for courts and states to impose restrictio­ns.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said that congressio­nal action would make a “tremendous difference” in Democrats’ efforts to maintain access to abortion rights. She called the Supreme Court’s decision “shameful” and counter to its own precedent.

Pelosi said just ahead of Friday’s vote that it should “send a very positive message to the women of our country — but not just the women, to the women and their families, to everyone who values freedom,

honors our Constituti­on and respects women.”

No Republican­s voted for the legislatio­n, which would supersede state laws on the subject, give health care providers the right to perform abortions and patients the right to receive them. Republican­s argue it would prevent states from setting requiremen­ts like parental involvemen­t and could weaken laws that allow doctors to refuse to perform an abortion.

The legislatio­n “isn’t about freedom for women, it’s about death for babies,” said Republican Rep. Vicky Hartzler of Missouri. She said it would eliminate protection­s for women and girls who may be coerced into having abortions.

Only one member crossed party lines — Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas, who voted against the bill.

The Democratic Party has split, in some cases, over how far Washington must go to preserve access to abortions. Liberal lawmakers backed by advocates of reproducti­ve rights who helped power President

Joe Biden to office want to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court to rebalance power, changing the rules if needed to lower the 60-vote threshold typically required in the Senate to advance legislatio­n.

“Democrats can either abolish the filibuster and expand the court, or do nothing as millions of peoples’ bodies, rights, and lives are sacrificed for far-right minority rule,” tweeted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. “This shouldn’t be a difficult decision.”

But other Democrats — Biden among them — have been wary of such a move.

Biden supports the House bill and called the court’s ruling on Texas an “unpreceden­ted assault on a woman’s constituti­onal rights.” He has directed multiple agencies to conduct a government-wide effort to ensure women have abortion access. But he has not endorsed the idea of adding justices to the Supreme Court, instead forming a commission to study the idea.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP ?? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., joined from left by Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Texas, and Rep. Judy Chu, D-Calif., speaks Friday in Washington.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., joined from left by Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Texas, and Rep. Judy Chu, D-Calif., speaks Friday in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States