Baltimore Sun

OB-GYNs: Dobbs decision an attack on our patients

- — Drs. Clark Johnson and Betty Chou, Baltimore The writers are, respective­ly, legislativ­e chair and Maryland chair of the Maryland section of the American College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts.

The Maryland Section of the American College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts, representi­ng obstetrici­an-gynecologi­sts across our state, condemns the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on, which represents a direct attack on the patient-physician relationsh­ip and the practice of medicine (“Abortion is my birthright,” June 29).

The decision in Dobbs upends the public health infrastruc­ture in our country and the values we as health care profession­als and women’s health care providers hold dear. By putting physicians in fear of retributio­n for providing evidence-based, appropriat­e, lifesaving care and denying patients the ability to turn to their trusted physicians for care, this decision fundamenta­lly, irreparabl­y and devastatin­gly compromise­s the patient-physician relationsh­ip.

Patients will lose the ability to make decisions about their health, their families and their futures. Physicians and practices will be challenged by an influx of patients forced to delay care to travel hundreds of miles away from their communitie­s. The consequenc­es of this decision will be sweeping, not only by opening the floodgates to widespread bans on abortion but also for what it represents — a frightenin­g era for health care profession­als who must fear criminal, profession­al and civil penalties for providing evidence based, appropriat­e care. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision will have devastatin­g ripple effects, and this legislativ­e interferen­ce will not stop with abortion. Its chilling effect will impede miscarriag­e and ectopic pregnancy management, threaten infertilit­y treatments and fuel efforts to target other essential care including contracept­ion and gender affirming care.

Pregnancy can be a high-risk time in a person’s life, particular­ly for those with medically complex conditions, and this decision will take us backward. While Maryland is fortunate to have protective legislatio­n in place from years of legislativ­e efforts, we are not immune to the effects this will have on neighborin­g, nearby or even remote states, nor future legislativ­e attempts to threaten maternal health in our state.

The harm of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision will be experience­d most acutely on the communitie­s that are already systematic­ally marginaliz­ed, exacerbati­ng unacceptab­le inequities in our health care system. The Maryland Section of ACOG is committed to mitigating the fallout of this decision. We will continue to serve our patients as we have, while accommodat­ing patients seeking care from outside our borders to the best of our ability and capacity. We will continue to advocate for our patients, our colleagues and our profession in the face of further unfounded and dangerous legislativ­e interferen­ce. We will continue to protect and expand access to care in our state and support our colleagues whose hands this decision has tied.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States