Baltimore Sun

Nuclear plant gives Russians cover

Ukrainians hesitant to return fire for fear of striking reactors

- By Andrew E. Kramer

NIKOPOL, Ukraine — Along most of the front line in Russia’s war in Ukraine, when one side lets loose with an artillery attack, the other shoots back.

But not in Nikopol, a city deep in southern farm country where the Ukrainian military faces a new and vexing obstacle as it prepares for a major counteroff­ensive: a nuclear power station that the Russian army has turned into a fortress.

Nikopol, controlled by the Ukrainians, lies on the west bank of the Dnieper River.

On the opposite bank sits a gigantic nuclear power plant — Europe’s largest — that the Russian army captured in March.

The Russians have been firing from the cover of the Zaporizhzh­ia power station since mid-July, Ukrainian military and civilian officials said, sending rockets over the river at Nikopol and other targets.

It is, in effect, a free shot. Ukraine cannot unleash volleys of shells in return using American-provided advanced rocket systems, which have silenced Russian guns elsewhere on the front line. Doing so would risk striking one of the six pressurize­d water reactors or highly radioactiv­e waste in storage.

And Russia knows it. “They are hiding there so they cannot be hit,” said Nikopol Mayor Oleksandr Sayuk. “Why else would they be at the electrical station? To use such an object as a shield is very dangerous.”

Residents have been fleeing Nikopol because of the dangers of both shelling and of a potential radiation leak.

And those who remain

feel helpless, as if they are targets in a shooting gallery.

“We are like condemned prisoners who must just stand still and be shot at,” said Halyna Hrashchenk­ova, a retiree whose home was hit by Russian artillery. “They shoot at us, and there is nothing we can do.”

The attacks from the nuclear plant are complicati­ng Ukraine’s plans in the south, which has become the focal point of the war as Russian advances in the east have slowed.

For more than two months, the Ukrainian army has been telegraphi­ng an intention to counteratt­ack on the west bank of the Dnieper, with the goal being to liberate the city of Kherson.

Using a long-range American rocket-launching system known as HIMARS, Ukraine has been softening up Russian positions and

cutting supply lines. Rocket strikes in July destroyed a road and railroad bridges pivotal for Russian resupply of forces on the west bank, to the south of Nikopol, closer to Kherson.

As the counteratt­ack picks up, the Zaporizhzh­ia nuclear plant poses a quandary. Russian forces have occupied the nuclear site since March 4 but began using it for artillery strikes only three weeks ago, Ukrainian officials say, about when HIMARS appeared on the battlefiel­d.

Shielded from return fire, the Russians are menacing Ukrainian troops advancing toward the Nova Kakhovka dam on the Dnieper, one of the last remaining crossing points for Russian resupply.

It is a problem Ukraine will have to solve as it moves troops and equipment into the area for the attack.

The Ukrainian army’s

retaliator­y options at Nikopol are limited.

One tactic it has tried is to execute precision strikes that avoid, as much as possible, the risk of damaging the reactors.

On July 22, for instance, Ukraine’s military intelligen­ce agency reported a strike with a kamikaze drone that blew up an anti-aircraft installati­on and a Grad rocket launcher. It also killed soldiers in a tent camp located about 150 yards from a reactor.

The fighting near the power plant has renewed worries that the war will set off a release of radiation in a country chockabloc­k with delicate and dangerous nuclear sites, including Chernobyl, which Russia occupied in March but then abandoned.

When the Russian army seized the Zaporizhzh­ia plant in March, combat

ignited a fire — and a good deal of worry about nuclear safety.

In that fighting, shrapnel hit but did not breach the containmen­t structure of Reactor No. 1. Three of the six reactors are active now, and the others are idled or under repair.

Only a direct strike with a powerful weapon would penetrate the reactors’ yardthick concrete containmen­t vessels, said Dmytro Orlov, exiled mayor of the city of Enerhodar, where the reactor is, and a former engineer at the plant.

But if that happened, it would risk a meltdown or explosion that could spread radiation on the wind within Ukraine and beyond, as happened at Chernobyl in 1986, the world’s worst nuclear disaster.

The fatigue and stress of the Ukrainian control room employees at the reactors are also a concern.

Russian soldiers have subjected them to harsh interrogat­ions, including torture with electrical shocks, suspecting them of sabotage or of informing the Ukrainian military about activities at the plant, Orlov said. About a dozen have vanished after being abducted, he said.

The site is in a nuclear regulatory limbo.

The Russian military controls the plant, but Ukrainian engineers operate it. The Russians allow Ukrainian truck convoys across the front line with spare parts and chemicals needed to process cooling water.

Ukrainian nuclear regulators also cross the front to visit the plant. Rosatom, the Russian state nuclear company, has sent about a dozen engineers to monitor its operation.

 ?? DAVID GUTTENFELD­ER/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Across the Dnieper River, the Zaporizhzh­ia Nuclear Power Plant can be seen last week from Ukrainian-held territory.
DAVID GUTTENFELD­ER/THE NEW YORK TIMES Across the Dnieper River, the Zaporizhzh­ia Nuclear Power Plant can be seen last week from Ukrainian-held territory.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States