Baltimore Sun

‘Trump factor’ killing the GOP’s buzz

- Jonah Goldberg

It’s one of the most enduring rules of thumb in American politics.

Since 1862, the president’s party has lost seats in the House in every midterm election except for 1934, 1998 and 2002. Until very recently, it seemed like the 2022 midterms would provide one more data point to this long-standing trend. And that is still likely. But talk of a “red wave,” never mind a “red tsunami,” has given way to talk of a Republican “ripple,” as handicappe­rs keep downgradin­g the GOP’s chances for big gains.

For many progressiv­es, the GOP’s deteriorat­ing prospects are directly attributab­le to a popular backlash against the Supreme Court’s overturnin­g of Roe v. Wade. Others point to a string of Democratic legislativ­e successes, better than expected job numbers, and a modest turnaround on high gas prices and a slowing of inflation generally.

And, of course, there’s the “Trump factor.” Since the search of his Mar-a-Lago home, the former president has dominated news coverage and has forced Republican­s to talk about him and his issues — both in the political and psychologi­cal sense — rather than stay on message about the Democrats’ failings.

No doubt, all of that is part of the explanatio­n. But plenty of presidents have had similar first-term successes over the last 160 years, and still suffered badly in the midterms. The president’s party lost 26 House seats in the average midterm election since World War II. CBS’ election tracker currently predicts a GOP pickup of half that number of seats.

Political scientists bicker about why midterms are good for the out-party.

But most of the explanatio­ns rely on two closely related factors. The first is that the midterms are a referendum on the party in power. When presidents have high approval numbers, they keep their losses down. The second factor is that the losers of the last election are more energized than the winners, so they turn out more.

Both of these theories are surely being borne out to some extent. President Joe Biden’s approval ratings have risen modestly from abysmal to not very good. And Democratic voters have become more enthusiast­ic in the wake of the Supreme Court decision overturnin­g Roe and thanks to the various Trump-related controvers­ies.

But I think there’s another way of explaining what’s happening. One of the great advantages of being the out-party is that you get to say “don’t blame us” and

“we didn’t do it” for everything that goes wrong. As the country goes in the wrong direction, you can be a backseat driver insisting you’d do it all differentl­y.

Republican­s were in such a sweet spot for more than a year. But it just doesn’t feel like Republican­s are out of power anymore. When the Republican-appointee-dominated Supreme Court handed down its abortion decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on, there was reason for skepticism that abortion would be a pivotal issue in the midterms. But Dobbs caught the GOP off guard.

In some Republican-controlled states, legislator­s passed sweeping abortion restrictio­ns. Others passed more modest ones. But in both cases, the GOP let the loudest voices on the right define the Republican position on abortion, defending extreme positions and playing into

Democratic framing.

Then there’s the Trump factor. It’s not just that Trump energizes the Democratic base — which is why Biden cynically elevated him in a speech last week — attacks on Trump also energize the GOP base, forcing Republican­s to rally around him.

More important, the very nature of the scandal around Trump’s egregious mishandlin­g of classified documents elicits a powerful deja vu effect. The former president is claiming executive privilege — despite the fact that he’s no longer president — and talking like he’s an unjustly deposed king in internal exile. In terms of the national conversati­on, it feels like the guy never left.

By making himself the issue that defines a “good” Republican, Trump and his enablers have frittered away their advantage,

turning what should be a referendum on the party in power into a choice between the two parties.

Recently William Barr, Trump’s former attorney general, said about the Mar-aLago search: “People say this was unpreceden­ted, well, it’s also unpreceden­ted for a president to take all this classified informatio­n and put them in a country club.”

It’s a good point with broader applicabil­ity. According to precedent, losing presidents go away. This allows their party to reinvent itself as the reasonable alternativ­e to the party in power. That’s a big reason why the midterm curse is such a powerful precedent. The GOP complacent­ly relied on that precedent while ignoring the reasons for its existence.

 ?? YONG KIM/THE PHILADELPH­IA INQUIRER ?? Since the search at Mar-a-Lago, former President Donald Trump has forced the GOP to focus on him.
YONG KIM/THE PHILADELPH­IA INQUIRER Since the search at Mar-a-Lago, former President Donald Trump has forced the GOP to focus on him.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States