Baltimore Sun

Biden’s speech was delivered with malice toward quite a few

- Bret Stephens Bret Stephens is a columnist for The New York Times, where this originally appeared.

Abraham Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address was a 3,600-word olive branch to a South on the eve of the Civil War. His second promised malice toward none after the war left 620,000 dead. Americans have long revered both speeches because they offered a measure of redemption, and a means of reconcilia­tion, to those who deserved it least.

Joe Biden’s speech in Philadelph­ia this month bears no resemblanc­e to either address, except that, in his own inaugural, he staked his presidency on ending “this uncivil war that pits red against blue.” So much for that. Like the predecesso­r he denounces, Biden has decided the best way to seek partisan advantage is to treat tens of millions of Americans as the enemy within.

How can an American president go wrong in identifyin­g threats to democracy? Biden offered a master class.

Start with the “MAGA Republican­s,” who, Biden said, “represent an extremism that threatens the very foundation­s of our Republic.”

Who are they? The president allowed that they are “not even the majority of Republican­s.” Then, in describing their goals, he cast a net so wide it included everyone from those who cheered the attack on the Capitol and the efforts to overturn the 2020 election, to those who oppose abortion rights and gay marriage. As categories go, this one is capacious. It includes violent Oath Keepers and Proud Boys — as well as every faithful Catholic or evangelica­l Christian whose deeply held moral conviction­s bring them to oppose legalized abortion.

It takes in the antisemite­s who marched at Charlottes­ville — as well as socially conservati­ve Americans with traditiona­l beliefs about marriage, which would have included Barack Obama during his 2008 run for president.

It encompasse­s undoubted election deniers like lawyers Sidney Powell and John Eastman — along with ordinary Americans who have been bamboozled into harboring misguided but sincere doubts about the integrity of the last election.

In other words, Biden claimed to distinguis­h MAGA Republican­s from mainstream ones and then proceeded to conflate them. That may resonate with partisan Democrats who have never seen a conservati­ve they didn’t consider a bigot or a fool. But it gives the lie to the idea that dismantlin­g MAGA Republican­ism is the prime objective of the president or his party.

Then there were the transparen­tly partisan purposes of Biden’s speech.

For this election cycle, pro-Democratic groups have spent north of $40 million in ad buys to help nominate the Trumpiest candidates in Republican primaries, on the theory that they will be easier to beat in November. That included a successful effort to defeat Michigan Rep. Peter Meijer — one of just 10 House Republican­s who voted for Donald Trump’s impeachmen­t last year — in last month’s GOP primary.

Is that smart as hardball politics? Maybe. But Biden could have spared us the pieties about timeless American values. As far as I can tell, he has yet to say a word in public against the ad buys, much less tried to stop them. Instead, his speech makes a neat bookend to a strategy of promoting MAGA extremists so they can be denounced as MAGA extremists. Some liberals took a similar approach in 2016, all but rooting for Trump to win the nomination on the theory that he’d be Hillary Rodham Clinton’s weakest opponent. Look how that worked out.

And then there was the crassest part of

Biden’s speech, in which an ostensible presidenti­al address became a campaign rally for Democratic priorities such as prescripti­on-drug benefits and the “clean energy future.” When a president makes the implicit claim that to be a small-d democrat one must today be a big-D Democrat he advances the interests of neither his party nor the country. He only gratuitous­ly insults millions of voters as deplorable­s while again branding Democrats as the party of sanctimony and condescens­ion.

I write this as someone who has long thought that Trump represents a unique threat to democracy.

He is the only president in American history who has refused to concede an election, who has schemed with conspiracy theorists to remain in power, who has sought to bully state officials into finding him votes, who has egged on a mob, who has cheered an assault on Congress, who has put the life of his vice president in jeopardy, who has flouted the demands of the Justice Department to return classified documents, who has violated every norm of American politics and every form of democratic decency. He is the tribune of the “mobocratic spirit” that Lincoln warned against in his first major address, and to which he devoted his life to stopping.

The gravest threat American democracy faces today isn’t the Republican Party, MAGA or otherwise. It’s Trump. He’s one man, sinister but also buffoonish. To defeat him, the core task is to make him seem small, very small. Biden’s misbegotte­n speech did precisely the opposite.

The next time Biden talks about democracy, he should remember Lincoln’s other exhortatio­n: charity for all.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States