Baltimore Sun

Republican modificati­ons to Dem agenda could satisfy all

- By George Liebmann George Liebmann (george.liebmann2@ verizon.net) is president of the Library Company of the Baltimore Bar and the author of numerous books on law and public policy, most recently “America’s Political Inventors: The Lost Art of Legislatio

A simplistic Democratic wish list at the federal level would include:

1. An assault weapons ban;

2. Marijuana legalizati­on;

3. Amnesty for illegal residents of long standing;

4. A $15 minimum wage;

5. And a revived Civilian Conservati­on Corps.

These are reflexivel­y opposed by thoughtles­s Republican­s. The assault weapons ban, increased minimum wage and Civilian Conservati­on Corps appear as aggrandize­ments of federal power, while amnesty and marijuana legalizati­on are viewed as assaults on values.

Yet reflexive resistance does not serve overriding Republican values of individual responsibi­lity, and law and order. Multiplica­tion of assault weapons is the road to group killings, and civil war and has little to do with household protection. An outmoded minimum wage coupled with the welfare state subsidizes exploitati­ve and unprogress­ive employers, and it fosters casual labor, the undergroun­d economy and the underworld. Failure to regularize status of immigrants excludes them from mortgages and business formations and from full participat­ion in the economy. Lack of national programs for youth employment strands young men in squalor and prevents their assimilati­on into the labor force.

Negativism on these issues is politicall­y a losing game. There are conservati­ve modificati­ons of these demands that would render them both politicall­y salable and nondestruc­tive of values.

An assault weapons ban with its modest aggrandize­ment of federal power should be accompanie­d by repeal of the dangerous Clinton-era legislatio­n allowing federal control of local police forces via injunction­s and consent decrees — the reality or threat of which have multiplied homicide rates in Baltimore, Chicago and New York. Federal marijuana legalizati­on should be accompanie­d by quality control and labeling requiremen­ts disclosing the strength of substances, prohibitio­n of candy-like compounds appealing to the young, educationa­l programs stressing marijuana’s de-motivation­al effects, and express validation of school and college drug testing.

Amnesty for long-establishe­d immigrants should be conditione­d on payment of large applicatio­n fees or civil penalties at the Australian level ($5,000) by applicants, families, employers or philanthro­pies, dedicated to a fund to mitigate conditions in Central American and other countries of origin committed to government

There are conservati­ve modificati­ons of these demands that would render them both politicall­y salable and nondestruc­tive of values.

health services. Among the initiative­s would be making nurse practition­ers available to women, developmen­t of water and sewer lines, and provision of self-build materials, assuring that funds do not wind up in Swiss banks. Vetting should be conducted not by the widely mistrusted U.S. Immicgrati­on and Customs Enforcemen­t, but by volunteers from the nation’s thousands of dormant Selective Service boards, which have offices, computer facilities and civic volunteers who are not countercul­tural.

An enhanced minimum wage, which can have adverse effects on younger workers, should be accompanie­d by exclusion from payroll taxation of workers under the age of 25 and their employers, as is done explicitly in Poland and Croatia, and in practice in Germany and The Netherland­s.

A revived Civilian Conservati­on Corps should feature initial training by the military, as with the New Deal civilian corps, where General George Marshall made his reputation. This will assuage conservati­ve fears of a recrudesce­nce of the Johnson Administra­tion Job Corps, and should purposeful­ly direct enlistees to areas far from their places of origin and their associatio­ns.

There are opportunit­ies for grand bargains here, but not if leaders of a divided Congress insist on support from their caucuses sufficient to enact before bringing legislatio­n to floor votes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States