Baltimore Sun

River a path to ambush Russians

Ukrainian specialist­s find natural barrier an advantage in war

- By Carlotta Gall

ON THE BANKS OF THE DNIEPER RIVER, Ukraine — Under cover of darkness, a group of soldiers heaved its dinghy off the sand into the water. Another group loaded equipment with a heavy clanking into their boat, while a third pushed off silently with oars. Engines humming quietly, the boats turned to the open water and disappeare­d into the blackness.

The fighters, a volunteer Ukrainian special forces team called the Bratstvo battalion, were crossing the wide expanse of the Dnieper River, the strategic waterway that bisects Ukraine and has become the dividing line of the southern front. After recapturin­g the city of Kherson this month, Ukrainian forces hold the western bank, while the Russians still hold the eastern bank.

To exploit weaknesses on the Russian side, the Bratstvo fighters have been conducting secret raids and other special operations for months, as part of the Ukrainian counteroff­ensive against Russian forces. On this night, their mission was to slip onto the eastern bank and lay mines on a road used by Russian soldiers and attack a mortar position.

“It’s a very dangerous mission,” said Oleksiy Serediuk, the battalion commander. “They need to land where there is a swarm of Russians. They need to go around them and plant mines.”

From the beginning of a conflict defined by heavy aerial and artillery bombardmen­t and grinding trench warfare, the Bratstvo battalion has undertaken some of the conflict’s most difficult missions, conducting forward spotting and sabotage

along the front lines, including in the early battles around the cities of Kyiv and Kharkiv. Now, in the battle for Ukraine’s south, they’ve learned to use boats and infiltrate the Russian-controlled side of the Dnieper River.

“We go on foot,” Serediuk said. “If we are conducting an ambush, we can go up to (almost 22 miles) and spend several days on task.”

The group gave access to The New York Times to report on two recent riverine operations that took place before the recapture of Kherson.

One mission had to be aborted. The other was a partial success.

“All the work along the southern front increases the stress on the Russians and increases their understand­ing that they will have to lose some resources on this front line,” Serediuk said. “So our actions are also some tiny

input in this overall result that Russians need to accept some compromise­s here.”

Planning begins with several days of reconnaiss­ance of Russian positions by the unit’s drone operators. Then they match intelligen­ce reports with reconnaiss­ance on the ground, and verify it with the Ukrainian military, which has its own sources.

The river, running more than 1,000 miles from north to south through Ukraine, is a great natural barrier and presents a huge challenge for any army. At some places it’s a mile wide, and in the reservoir basin the distance from one shore to another is as much as 12 or 15 miles.

In late October the drone unit, working from a boat offshore, spotted Russian troops arriving at a camp. They seemed to be newly mobilized conscripts, since they showed little operationa­l awareness; some were

dragging wheeled suitcases into two communal buildings, said Vitaliy Chorny, head of intelligen­ce-gathering for the Bratstvo battalion.

The fresh informatio­n prompted the Ukrainians to change the target of their planned attack that night. They armed two teams with rocket-propelled grenades, a machine gun and other automatic weapons.

“They will attack these two houses and will also take out the electrical transforme­r,” Chorny explained. “We found smaller groups are better” for stealth, he added. A larger group had compounded the problems on previous operations, he said. “We had more wounded, more boats and were drawing attention to ourselves.”

That evening the team crouched around a computer screen to watch the drone footage as the reconnaiss­ance officer briefed them. The officer, who goes by the code name Stoic and operates drones, estimated there were 40 Russians in the two buildings closest to the shore and more spread out in the settlement.

Within an hour, the Ukrainians were outfitted with night vision goggles, weapons and waterproof capes, and they descended to the beach. They recited a prayer together, then loaded up the narrow rubber dinghies and set out, hunched silent figures in the dark.

That mission, as others have been, was thwarted by circumstan­ce. When they reached the target, they found a large concentrat­ion of Russian soldiers setting up observatio­n positions and a machine-gun post along the shore. Outnumbere­d, the Ukrainians lingered out of sight, watching for an opportunit­y, but after several hours one of the dinghies sprung a leak, and they called off the operation.

Serediuk shrugged off the failure as in the nature of the job. “Something always goes wrong,” he said. But the unit has had notable successes, he said. They had recently taken out a Russian mortar that long plagued them and other Ukrainian troops, and had downed a Russian helicopter.

Two weeks after the aborted operation, the unit set out after a new target, a Russian camp with two mortar positions. A team was readied to go in three dinghies and a support boat. Among them was a group of Russian volunteers, political refugees who had been living in Ukraine for several years and had taken up arms on the Ukrainian side.

A single female soldier, armed with a shoulder-fired anti-tank weapon, joined the team. The woman, who uses the code name Vita, is Serediuk’s wife, and she has gained an almost mythical renown for surviving close combat with Russian troops.

They set off under a cold, bright moon, swiftly disappeari­ng in the gloom.

The soldiers were back before dawn, unloading on the same beach, cold, weary and with few words. “Excellent,” said one soldier clomping back up the beach. One boat had broken down, but within half an hour the operationa­l commander reported all were back on base.

“We laid the mines and then came back without any noise, and they did not see us,” said one 18-yearold soldier. He said he had watched the Russians from a distance of 100 yards or more.

But the unit had not pushed farther to attack the mortar positions. The lay of the land was not good, the moonlight too bright and the group too large, said Vita. “Lots of boots, lots of noise,” she said. “And we froze a lot.”

 ?? IVOR PRICKETT/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Ukrainian volunteer fighters launch a reconnaiss­ance drone Oct. 22 on the Dnieper River.
IVOR PRICKETT/THE NEW YORK TIMES Ukrainian volunteer fighters launch a reconnaiss­ance drone Oct. 22 on the Dnieper River.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States