Baltimore Sun

State presence at Back River wastewater plant extended

- By Christine Condon

Staffers from the Maryland Environmen­tal Service will remain at the troubled Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant through April 30 under a new agreement between the state and Baltimore.

Under a previous agreement, the state agency’s tenure at the plant was set to end Dec. 31. But now, the Environmen­tal Service will remain into the spring, as long as the city’s Board of Estimates agrees. Its next meeting will take place next Wednesday.

The state also has been in negotiatio­ns with the city to establish a judicial consent decree that would regulate activities at Back River and Patapsco — the city’s other wastewater plant, which also has dealt with severe equipment issues and polluting overflows. If a consent decree is executed, it could supersede the agreement extending the Environmen­tal Service through April 30 at Back River.

State officials dispatched the Environmen­tal Service to the plant in March, after inspection­s revealed serious maintenanc­e problems were going unresolved, resulting in excess pollution of the Back River.

Baltimore, which owns and operates the plant located in Dundalk in Baltimore County, initially fought back against the state’s interventi­on, including by filing a legal challenge.

But months later, the city signed an agreement with the state, creating a plan to reimburse the Environmen­tal Service for its costs. Under that agreement, the agency would leave if the plant could meet its pollution limits for three straight months.

Though internal equipment issues persisted, the plant was able to comply with pollution limits from June to August, which would have prompted the Environmen­tal Service to depart. But the parties agreed to an extension through the end of 2022. The agreement announced Wednesday is the second extension.

In addition to a lawsuit filed by the state — which prompted the consent decree negotiatio­ns — Baltimore also faces a federal lawsuit from environmen­tal nonprofit Blue Water Baltimore.

Blue Water Baltimore is a party to the consent decree negotiatio­ns as well, and its Baltimore Harbor waterkeepe­r, Alice Volpitta, said Monday that the negotiatio­ns are making progress of late.

Angela Haren, a senior attorney with the Chesapeake Legal Alliance, which is representi­ng Blue Water in its case, said Wednesday that, “although significan­t progress has been made” at the Back River plant, the groups still have concerns about its “resiliency and ongoing maintenanc­e.”

And, she said, there are still “major issues that haven’t been addressed at the Patapsco plant, which hasn’t seen any interventi­on from the Environmen­tal Service.

“It’s been clear that MES’ involvemen­t at Back River has helped start the process towards coming into compliance, so we feel reassured by their presence there and support their ongoing involvemen­t,” Haren said.

Word of a new agreement for Back River comes shortly after the announceme­nt that Jason Mitchell, the city’s director of public works, will be resigning, effective in April. In a news release, Mayor Brandon Scott said Mitchell stepped down to take care of family.

Mitchell served as public works director for less than two years and his tenure included the state’s discovery of problems at the wastewater treatment plants, operated by DPW. However, he was mainly facing criticism from City Council members angered by reduced recycling pickup

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States