Baltimore Sun

Baltimore shouldn’t give away conduits like it gave away what is now Johns Hopkins Bayview

- — Dolph Druckman, Baltimore

As Baltimore City ponders how best to sustain one of it’s widely perceived assets in the undergroun­d conduit system, let’s not forget what transpired years ago when an unrealized municipal asset was seen as a significan­t burden (“Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott pushes forward conduit agreement vote, circumvent­ing members who sat out meeting,” Feb. 15).

It was 1984, or thereabout­s. A parcel of significan­t acreage, containing a diversity of institutio­ns collective­ly known as Baltimore City Hospitals was seen as a significan­t hazard for the city due to continuing operating losses. The city had little clue on how to operate the campus and its long-standing public hospital. William Donald Schaefer saw this clearly and made a grand and quick deal. It was a giveaway sweetheart deal that had a $10 million guarantee against losses for the new receiver of this 130-acre gift, The Johns Hopkins Hospital and The Johns Hopkins University.

The rest is the history of Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center.

Was it a win-win as it had been promoted? Some would say categorica­lly yes, but others say perhaps Baltimore was sold short. All corporatio­ns seeking to control assets do so because it satisfies their fundamenta­l drive for growth. It’s the same regardless of the corporatio­n’s tax status (whether for-profit or not-for-profit). The real challenge with any public asset is how to sustain (if not build) on services that are needed by all efficientl­y. Government­s don’t do this well and corporatio­ns increasing­ly serve themselves and not necessaril­y direct public good — just look at the status of health care today. In a system where there’s no market control for costs, we are all now medically indigent and form fodder (and profit) for corporate medical debt collection.

The provocativ­e analogy of utility conduit with health care may not be valid for a whole range of reasons. But then, as we consider who controls the flow of informatio­n as a public asset and ask who benefits, the comparison may be spot on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States