Baltimore Sun

Maryland bill protects libraries from unconstitu­tional censorship

- By Yara Cheikh Yara Cheikh (ycheikh@ aol.com) is president of the Library Board of Trustees within the Baltimore County Public Library.

Americans are despondent over the partisan nature of our country.

Yet there remain spaces in this country that are remarkably democratic and nonpartisa­n: our public libraries. Libraries serve each American who walks through the door from all of the diverse socioecono­mic, racial and geographic communitie­s across our nation. It is incredible work performed by humble and hardworkin­g people.

Currently, there is a bill in Annapolis that will protect the ability of our library staff to meet the needs of every customer. House Bill 785, entitled the Freedom to Read Act, codifies the fundamenta­l mission of our libraries — providing access for all. Moreover, it establishe­s principles for curating a responsibl­e library collection. The bill also protects community collection­s from deliberate theft, and libraries and library staff from punitive action for doing their work within the policies and procedures outlined by their organizati­ons. Fundamenta­lly, the bill affirms constituti­onal librarians­hip and protects libraries as they continue to defend against unconstitu­tional censorship.

Librarians know it is not the role of the library to determine a value set for our children or communitie­s. This role sits squarely with families. But just as importantl­y, it is not the right of any individual, party or ideology to determine what materials belong in our libraries. That is the job of trained librarians who develop collection­s.

In libraries throughout the nation, there are books on the shelves that present diametrica­lly opposing views, repugnant ideologies or challenges to traditiona­l philosophi­es. Simply put, our collection­s are diverse, living and profession­ally selected. The Freedom to Read Act means our libraries remain free from any one belief system or the influences of politics. It allows individual visitors the freedom to satisfy their curiosity and choose what they read.

To be engaged citizens of our counties, states and nation, we must know their history and the unique challenges our neighbors have witnessed. We must remain current on the ideas and perspectiv­es of our fellow citizens. The opportunit­y to do all this resides at the library. Materials are available for all of us to grow as individual­s and arrive at our conclusion­s regarding issues of the day.

It is important for all of us to celebrate the creative expression that fiction provides us. Sometimes we find something in a character that parallels our own lives. Other times we learn about cultures, histories, and individual­s that are vastly different from our own. Reading develops intellectu­al knowledge and empathy and respect for others. It can provide respite for the soul.

Why is there an urgency for these protection­s now? Data from the Maryland State Library show that the number of formal book challenges to public libraries has increased by 133% between 2019 and 2023, with a peak of 233% in 2022. The number of individual­s submitting book challenges to Maryland public libraries increased by 245% in the past year. Nationwide in the first nine months of 2023, 49% of all book challenges targeted public libraries and public librarians, a dramatic increase from 16% the prior year.

What happens if we curtail readers’ access to certain resources? We limit our autonomy to choose what we read. We silence the voices of marginaliz­ed people as proposed book bans regularly target writers and subjects of color and the LGBTQ+ community. As a trustee of Baltimore County Public Library, I advise members of my community, “If you don’t like it, don’t check it out, but don’t stop someone else from having the option.”

As citizens in a democracy, we must protect the freedom to explore new ideas, to have dissenting opinions heard, to vigorously argue our own unique perspectiv­es. The public library must remain a nonpartisa­n space in which different perspectiv­es are available and robust conversati­ons take place. The library should be the protected space in which the most rigorous debate exists. It is nonpartisa­n and truly democratic to allow every community the freedom to read, and we must enshrine those protection­s with the passage of the Freedom to Read Act.

Libraries are sacred spaces of endless imaginatio­n, creativity and informatio­n. Our libraries and our staff must be free to engage in the important work of providing access to all. In the days ahead, let your elected officials know that passage of the Freedom to Read Act is vital to preserving our democracy.

The public library must remain a nonpartisa­n space in which different perspectiv­es are available and robust conversati­ons take place.

 ?? BRIAN KRISTA/STAFF ?? A woman browses a section of books at the Catonsvill­e branch of the Baltimore County Public Library in May 2021. A bill before the Maryland legislatur­e would protect libraries from unconstitu­tional censorship.
BRIAN KRISTA/STAFF A woman browses a section of books at the Catonsvill­e branch of the Baltimore County Public Library in May 2021. A bill before the Maryland legislatur­e would protect libraries from unconstitu­tional censorship.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States