Boston Herald

Prez doubles down on toxic rhetoric

Uses weapons of anti-Semites for Iran nuke debate

- By JEFF ROBBINS Jeff Robbins, a former U.S. delegate to the U.N. Human Rights Commission during the Clinton administra­tion, is an attorney in Boston.

For decades, black civil rights leaders have worried that black Americans’ largely automatic support for Democrats has led the Democratic Party to take their votes for granted. Against a backdrop of frightenin­g anti-Semitism in Europe, the increasing­ly aggressive use of anti-Jewish tropes by the president of the United States to attack critics of his nuclear deal with Iran has begun to raise similar concerns among American Jews, the Democratic Party’s second-most reliable constituen­cy.

It was Republican Secretary of State James Baker during the George H.W. Bush administra­tion who famously derided Jews thusly: “(Blank) ’em. They don’t vote for us anyway.” Baker was not wrong. Democratic candidates have won 60 percent or more of the Jewish vote in 21 out of 22 presidenti­al elections since 1928.

But having failed in his effort to block the American peoples’ representa­tives in Congress from reviewing his nuclear agreement with Iran, President Obama will likely find himself required to use his veto to override both American public opinion and Congress. A recent Quinnipiac poll found that Americans oppose the deal by a 2-1 margin, and Congress will vote to disapprove it. It is not difficult to see why. The arrangemen­t will surrender all diplomatic and economic leverage over Iran, provide the world’s foremost state sponsor of terror with some $150 billion to acquire convention­al and ballistic weapons, remove internatio­nal restrictio­ns on such acquisitio­ns and virtually guarantee that Iran will obtain nuclear weapons some 10 to 15 years from now.

Even though all he needs in order to sustain his veto is to persuade most fellow Democrats to stick with him out of party loyalty, the president has doubleddow­n on his strategy of blaming the widespread opposition to his deal on Jews, using malodorous rhetoric suffused with coded bigotry.

Criticism of his deal, our president says, is the work of “money,” “donors” and “lobbyists” who “demand” war, and whose “drumbeat for war” is motivated by their “affinity for … Israel.” The specter of an American president using the time-honored rhetorical weapons of anti-Semites to improve poll numbers has been sickening to many, but perhaps most of all to American Jews who voted to elect and then re-elect him.

Indeed, the AntiDefama­tion League, the venerable civil rights organizati­on, has condemned the Obama White House in unusually strong terms. “[T]he Administra­tion,” it said on July 20, “should desist from the kinds of demagogic accusation­s and insinuatio­ns claiming that opponents of the deal are warmongers.”

That the White House veto of Congress’ resolution of disapprova­l of the Iran deal seems likely to prevail has not softened its furious attacks on skeptics, or diluted its efforts to generate support by turning Americans against Israel and American Jewry. It has embraced the obverse of Baker’s formulatio­n. “Blank ’em,” is the Democratic administra­tion’s apparent attitude toward the Jewish community. “They’ll vote for us regardless.”

It may be right. Jews have little sympathy for Republican positions on civil rights, marriage equality and reproducti­ve freedom, among others. Still, while they have been staunch supporters of Democratic Party and Obama, there was some evidence that the latter’s conduct and the former’s tacit support for it had taken its toll even before the administra­tion turned truly poisonous.

According to Gallup, in 2008 71 percent of Jews identified as Democrats; by 2014 it was down to 61 percent. Obama’s approval rating among Jews was 77 percent in 2009; by March 2015 it was 54 percent.

The president’s purposeful use of language fraught with bigotry would be a stain on his presidency under any circumstan­ces. That he has employed the very divisive rhetoric he professes to abhor in order to bypass the American people on a matter fundamenta­l to their national security, and to intimidate those who sincerely believe his course on Iran is dangerous, only deepens that stain. It is a stain painful for all Americans, and not only Jewish-Americans, to contemplat­e.

 ??  ?? OBAMA: Has blamed the widespread opposition to his Iran deal on Jews.
OBAMA: Has blamed the widespread opposition to his Iran deal on Jews.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States