Boston Herald

Conservati­ve confab strays from its roots

- By KATHLEEN PARKER Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist.

WASHINGTON — Remember when conservati­sm meant deep thinkers and big ideas? Get over it.

Today, conservati­sm means get your Miley (Cyrus) on and show us your tongue, shout Trump to the rafters, if you can pony up the privilege of “free speech,” and young — very young — “love.”

Or so it would seem judging by this year’s lead-up to the annual CPAC (Conservati­ve Political Action Conference) that began here Wednesday. If young conservati­ves came looking for mentors and for values confirmati­on, they may have wasted their ticket.

A variety of false starts and weird moments suggests that American conservati­sm is reinventin­g itself along lines that stray far from original intent. R.I.P., if you can, Bill Buckley.

An ad on the CPAC webpage prominentl­y features nouvelle conservati­ve vamp Dana Loesch, a conservati­ve radio host in Dallas and yet another protege of Breitbart News. In the photo, Loesch is doing her best imitation of the “Miley,” tongue super-extended, and is making the sign of the devil with her hand — two middle fingers tucked into the palm, pinkie and pointer extended like two horns.

Presumably, this is considered cool to a certain demographi­c, though Loesch, at 38, might be considered post-cool. Her message, if I may dare an interpreta­tion: It’s safe for the cool and hip to attend a convention dominated by gnarly grownups, although, fair warning, President Trump is also planning to attend.

In another sign of conservati­ve disruption, the speaker lineup is missing many of conservati­sm’s most interestin­g voices. Sometimes getting a turn at the lectern depends on one’s willingnes­s to contribute to the CPAC’s parent organizati­on, the American Conservati­ve Union (ACU). Oftentimes, sponsors want to speak and/or direct the agenda.

Also necessary this year is one’s ringing support of Trump. Those who entertain subversive thinking, also known as thinking, aren’t invited.

Finally, the straw that broke the elephant’s back was CPAC’s intended keynote speaker, Milo Yiannopoul­os, or just Milo for ease of spelling. For the uninitiate­d, Milo is a provocateu­r infamous for saying anything. He makes Trump seem like a paragon of restraint by comparison. Think of him as a British hybrid of Howard Stern and Ann Coulter.

His penchant for the outrageous backfired on him when a video from last year surfaced in which Milo praised sex between 13-yearold boys and adult men as “life-affirming” in the gay community. Ruminating on his own sexual prowess, he boasted that he wouldn’t be nearly as good were it not for his own alleged childhood molestatio­n at the hands of a Catholic priest. Milo denies that this constitute­s pedophilia or pederasty.

Did CPAC officialdo­m not know whom they were inviting? Milo’s record is hardly obscure. He, too, was a Breitbart fellow. Are you noting a trend here? On Monday, Milo’s CPAC invitation was rescinded following loud protests. Then on Tuesday, Milo resigned as tech editor for Breitbart News.

His utterly bizarre selection fairly yawns with Republican irony. Recall that in 2015, the gay Log Cabin Republican­s weren’t allowed to participat­e in CPAC. Apparently eager to show that conservati­ves aren’t anti-gay, this year the organizati­on invited an alt-righter who happens to be gay.

Matt Schlapp, CPAC organizer and ACU chair (as well as lobbyist and political commentato­r), defended the invitation, saying Milo could talk about his recent experience at the University of California at Berkeley, where he was canceled as a speaker following student protests.

It seems no one outside of a comedy club wants to hear what Milo has to say. Yes, suppressio­n of unwelcome speech and all the attendant snowflaker­y on college campuses deserves a passionate challenge, but there are plenty of others who could make the case for intellectu­al diversity without engaging the perverse.

Clearly, Schlapp wanted a glitzy headliner to draw a crowd. This isn’t a criminal offense, but it might be craven. This year’s CPAC suggests a certain desperatio­n to be relevant and the unwinding of core conservati­ve principles, which can’t be separated from the imperative to seek out and exercise our better angels. If the brilliance of your ideas won’t draw a crowd, then maybe you need better ideas.

Meanwhile, the ACU, the oldest conservati­ve lobbying organizati­on in the country, has betrayed the greats of conservati­ve thought and tradition and become just another political party, trading its heraldic mission for money, fame and power.

It’s an old story — still and always sad.

 ?? AP PHOTO ?? MILO: Ousted keynoter was CPAC’s quest for ‘cool.’
AP PHOTO MILO: Ousted keynoter was CPAC’s quest for ‘cool.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States