Boston Herald

Drug-injection sites save lives

- By MARK EISENBERG, BILL FRIED and JAMES STEWART Mark Eisenberg, M.D., Bill Fried and James Stewart are members of SIFMANow.org, a volunteer organizati­on representi­ng medical and public health profession­als and other citizens. “As You Were Saying” is a reg

AS YOU WERE SAYING ...

Imagine being severely addicted, cut off from family and finances; desperate. Now imagine a supportive place where you could manage and hopefully transcend your addiction and related problems. Such places, called supervised injection facilities, or SIFs, are a proven, effective way to confront the devastatio­n of lives lost among the severely addicted and undertreat­ed.

We have mourned too many deaths even as doctors, pharmaceut­ical companies, insurance companies and street dealers push instant miracles — quick fixes — on the vulnerable. It is of little import whether those victims had character flaws, unlucky genes, an acquired brain disease, or confronted unspeakabl­e emotional or physical hurt. They are everywhere and anyone.

But addictive drugs and people who use them have always been with us. And so we must ask: Why are so many dying?

The circumstan­ces under which many ingest drugs are often more life-threatenin­g than the powerful drugs themselves.

Users are isolated, stigmatize­d and fearful of the authoritie­s. Fear of arrest leads to furtive, unsafe practices and death.

Most users cannot know the potency or actual contents of their drug. Zero tolerance — the demand for abstinence or else — in both treatment programs and prison yields people whose tolerance drops such that the first time they relapse, they may be killed by formerly manageable doses.

Politician­s and police department­s are mercifully moving from punitive, zero tolerance policies toward a more supportive harm-reduction approach, including needle exchanges and Narcan — acknowledg­ing that neither the drugs nor those using them are going away.

These changes are part of a welcome move toward effective treatment, which is labor intensive, hands-on, and non-punitive. It features connection, caring and respect. And it demands responsibi­lity on the part of the addicted.

Which brings us to perhaps the most potent medical tool in this effort: supervised injection facilities — the answer to medical homelessne­ss.

At such facilities, people bring in and ingest street-bought drugs under the supervisio­n of supportive medical profession­als who can test for potency and contaminat­ion. There are roughly 100 SIFs in over half a dozen countries. And after literally millions of such injections, there has yet to be a fatality. Overdoses are routinely and safely reversed. Supported by the American Medical Associatio­n and the Massachuse­tts Medical Society, this medical interventi­on has been shown to work in hundreds of peerreview­ed studies without negative side effects.

It is a portal to hope proven to reduce public disorder, not an additional burden on burdened neighborho­ods.

The oath to do no harm includes the imperative to not withhold viable, proven treatments, whether in the form of a pill or a policy. SIFs are a proven, life-saving medical treatment.

We have, all of us, mourned too many unnecessar­y deaths. How can a measured, effective response to the epidemic not include this treatment option?

The oath to do no harm includes the imperative to not withhold viable, proven treatments, whether in teh form of a pill or a policy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States