Boston Herald

Did Obama go wobbly on Hezbollah?

- Peter BROOKES Peter Brookes is a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation and a former deputy assistant secretary of defense. Follow him on Twitter @Brookes_Peter.

If true, it’s extremely troubling. I’m referring to the explosive Politico investigat­ive piece, “The secret backstory on how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook,” published this week. While not uplifting, it’s a worthy holiday read.

Without spoiling it, the fascinatin­g story alleges that the Obama administra­tion stonewalle­d a law enforcemen­t program known as “Project Cassandra,” and failed to deliver some serious body blows to Hezbollah because of its bid to get Iran into — and to stay in — the 2016 nuclear deal.

OK, so what’s wrong with that? Plenty.

The article claims that Hezbollah was involved in a vast global criminal enterprise, including drug traffickin­g to the United States, that may have generated as much as $1 billion a year in revenue for its cause. That’s a big problem.

Even putting aside the evils of drug traffickin­g, that’s a lot of cash finding its way into the pockets of a bad-to-the-bone foreign terrorist organizati­on — which has the U.S. in its crosshairs.

Remember the havoc ISIS wreaked when it was able to sell

beaucoup barrels of oil on the black market? It paid for a terrorist army that came to control large swaths of Iraqi and Syrian territory, putting millions under its Islamist control.

Hezbollah is one of the most notorious, most capable terrorist organizati­ons in the world today — in the big leagues with the likes of ISIS and al-Qaeda.

It may be best known here for its attack on the Marine barracks and the U.S. embassy in Beirut in 1983, which took more than 300 lives. The “Party of God” also bombed a Jewish com- munity center in Buenos Aires in 1994.

Hezbollah has fought with Israel any number of times. It destabiliz­es its homeland, Lebanon, with violence, supports Shiite militias in Iraq, the rebels in Yemen and the Bashar Assad regime in Syria.

It has long been active in this hemisphere, too. Hezbollah was particular­ly welcome in Venezuela during President Hugo Chavez’s times. It’s believed that Hezbollah retains plans for attacking the U.S.; indeed, in June, two operatives were arrested here.

The Shiite militant group has also been implicated in an attack in Bulgaria and plots in Thailand, Cyprus, Azerbaijan and Peru.

It’s supported by — and supports — Iran.

As bad as all that is, the Obama administra­tion’s decision to go easy on Hezbollah’s money-making operations looks worse, considerin­g the controvers­ial results of the nuclear deal with Tehran.

Recall: The pact leaves Iran as a threshold nuclear state, has a “sunset clause” that limits the length of the agreement’s restrictio­ns, allows Iran to continue uraniumenr­iching centrifuge research and has holes in its verificati­on procedures.

Even though some defenders of the Obama administra­tion’s decisions on Hezbollah in the article point out that there were bigger policy goals to consider — for example, concluding the Iran nuclear deal — we still need to know more.

But while we wait for an explanatio­n from the previous administra­tion we doubt will ever come, it seems Team Trump is changing course drasticall­y toward a tougher line on Iran and its proxies, including Hezbollah. That switch comes not a moment too soon.

Hezbollah was involved in a vast global criminal enterprise, including drug traffickin­g to the U.S., that may have generated $1 billion a year in revenue.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States