Boston Herald

Judicial Vetting 101

-

Few institutio­ns are as critical to a well-functionin­g democracy as an independen­t judiciary. And so at the federal level the job comes with life tenure.

While there is a kind of to-thevictor-belong-the-spoils element to judicial nomination­s, it is also crucial that such appointmen­ts are first rate — regardless of a nominee’s ideologica­l bent — especially at the district court level, where experience is important.

In the past week three potential judicial clunkers put forward by the Trump administra­tion have been withdrawn — and the nation is better for that.

The most visible, public humiliatio­n was that of Matthew Petersen, nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who was whittled down to size by U.S. Sen. John Neely Kennedy (R-La.) in what became a viral video of Petersen failing to answer any of Kennedy’s questions about his knowledge of the law.

That Petersen was a former colleague on the Federal Election Commission of White House counsel Don McGahn seemed to be his chief qualificat­ion.

“I had hoped my nearly two decades of public service might carry more weight than my two worst minutes on television,” Petersen wrote in a letter to Trump, asking that his nomination be withdrawn.

Last week, the White House withdrew two other nomination­s at the request of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa). Brett Talley, 36, nominated for the court in Alabama, a speechwrit­er for Republican candidates and a writer of horror novels, had been rated not qualified by the American Bar Associatio­n. He also happens to be the husband of McGahn’s chief of staff.

Jeff Mateer, nominated for the Eastern District of Texas, had made some speeches in which he equated same-sex marriage with polygamy and described transgende­r children as proof of “Satan’s plan.”

That the nomination­s of all three men are now history is a relief — assuming the Trump administra­tion takes to heart the lesson that the vetting process is not to be taken lightly. And theirs leaves much to be desired.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States