Boston Herald

Twitter details political ad ban

Admits it expects to make mistakes

-

Twitter’s new ban on political ads will cover appeals for votes, solicitati­ons for campaign contributi­ons and any political content. But the company quickly acknowledg­ed Friday that it expects to make mistakes as individual­s and groups look for loopholes.

Twitter is defining political content to include any ad that references a candidate, political party, government official, ballot measure, or legislativ­e or judicial outcome. The ban also applies to all ads — even non-political ones — from candidates, political parties and elected or appointed government officials.

However, Twitter is allowing ads related to social causes such as climate change, gun control and abortion. People and groups running such ads won’t be able to target those ads down to a user’s ZIP code or use political categories such as “conservati­ve” or “liberal.” Rather, targeting must be kept broad, based on a user’s state or province, for instance.

News organizati­ons will be exempt so they can promote stories that cover political issues. While Twitter has issued guidelines for what counts as a news organizati­on — single-issue advocacy outlets don’t qualify, for instance — it’s unclear if this will be enough to prevent partisan websites from promoting political content.

Twitter announced its worldwide ban on political ads Oct. 30, but didn’t release details until Friday. The policy, which goes into effect next Friday, is in stark contrast to Facebook’s approach of allowing political ads, even if they contain false informatio­n. Facebook has said it wants to provide politician­s with a “level playing field” for communicat­ion and not intervene when they speak, regardless of what they’re saying.

Response to Twitter’s ban has been strong and mixed, with critics questionin­g the company’s ability to enforce the new policy given its poor history banning hate speech and abuse from its service. The company acknowledg­es it will make mistakes but says it’s better to start addressing the issue now rather than wait until all the kinks are worked out.

Aside from ongoing concerns about foreign elections interferen­ce, the political advertisin­g issue rose to the forefront in recent months as Twitter, along with Facebook and Google, refused to remove a misleading video ad from President Trump’s campaign that targeted Democratic presidenti­al candidate Joe Biden.

In response, Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, another presidenti­al hopeful, ran her own ad on Facebook taking aim at Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The ad claimed — admittedly falsely to make its point — that Zuckerberg endorsed Trump for reelection.

Over the past several weeks, Facebook has been pressed to change its policy. But it was Twitter instead that jumped in with its bombshell ban.

 ?? AP FILE ?? CHARACTER ISSUE: The Twitter logo is displayed above a trading post on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. The company offered details Friday on its ban on political ads.
AP FILE CHARACTER ISSUE: The Twitter logo is displayed above a trading post on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. The company offered details Friday on its ban on political ads.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States