Boston Herald

Pro-Palestinia­ns keep on harming Palestinia­ns

- Jeff ROBBINS Jeff Robbins is a Boston lawyer, former U.S. delegate to the United Nations Human Rights Commission, and syndicated columnist.

With the same sad inevitabil­ity of death and taxes, a body professing to care about the Palestinia­ns but mostly rabidly opposed to Israel took action this month that followed a familiar pattern: invoking the plight of Palestinia­ns while doing them damage.

For the umpteenth time, the source of the disconnect was the UN Human Rights Council, a bureaucrac­y long recognized by Democratic and Republican administra­tions alike as so debilitate­d by hypocrisy in general and anti-Israel bias in particular as to have precious credibilit­y left.

The action: the Council’s publicatio­n of a blacklist of companies, including American ones, that in some fashion “do business” with Jews living in Israeli settlement­s, including settlement­s that everyone, including Palestinia­n negotiator­s, acknowledg­e will formally become part of Israel in any eventual peace deal.

The purpose: to support the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, the vehicle of choice for those whose detestatio­n of Israel outpaces their concern for the welfare of actual Palestinia­ns.

For starters, the UN’s encouragem­ent of the boycotting of businesses that engage with Israeli settlement­s on the West Bank largely hurts Palestinia­ns. According to a report issued by the watchdog group Palestinia­n Media Watch based on interviews with Palestinia­n workers and lawyers and the Palestinia­n Bureau of Statistics, Palestinia­ns prefer working for Israeli companies on the West Bank to Palestinia­n ones. Israeli employers pay substantia­lly higher wages and provide Palestinia­ns with the same health care benefits, sick leave and vacation time as Israelis. The boycotts of these companies, therefore, disproport­ionately harm Palestinia­ns.

This did not stop the vapid endorsemen­ts of the Council’s move by Palestinia­n leaders, who compete with one another to find slogans that make the least sense. “A timely message for those who push us toward chaos and lawlessnes­s,” tweeted Husam Zomlot, the head of the Palestinia­n Mission to the United Kingdom about a boycott which may separate Palestinia­ns who want to work from the jobs that permit them to do so. He was trumped by Palestinia­n Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malik, who called the UN’s call for a boycott “a victory for internatio­nal law and diplomatic efforts,” a head-scratcher if ever there was one.

The history of Palestinia­n self-harm is long, wearying and depressing. Had Palestinia­n leaders accepted the independen­t Palestinia­n state created for them by the UN in 1947, there would never have been any Israeli settlement­s on the West Bank. Had they chosen to create a Palestinia­n state when Israel had no presence on the West Bank — likewise no settlement­s. Had they accepted the Palestinia­n state on virtually all of the West Bank and all of Gaza with a capital in East Jerusalem offered by Israel in 2000, 2001 and again in 2009, ditto. The narrative peddled by Israel’s detractors so insistentl­y that the source of the unending Palestinia­n-Israeli conflict is Jewish settlement­s isn’t merely ahistoric. It’s balderdash.

It reflects no love for the knot of right-wing religious zealots who have Israel’s democracy in their grip to point that out. One may be repulsed by Benjamin Netanyahu’s noxious authoritar­ianism, or by how the Netanyahu-Trump lovefest is degrading American empathy for Israel, and still stipulate the obvious: When Palestinia­ns reject an independen­t Palestinia­n state over and over, offered to them by left-leaning Israeli leaders and centrist ones, it ain’t Netanyahu or West Bank settlement­s that pose the real problem.

Whether it is boycotts bathed in the clever rhetoric of human rights but guaranteed to hurt Palestinia­ns most of all, or the organized terrorizin­g of Jewish kids on college campuses aimed at browbeatin­g them into abandoning their support for a Jewish national homeland, the BDS movement has made intimidati­on its trademark. As Arab and African states have drawn closer and closer to Israel, and patience in the Mideast for the Palestinia­n preference for victimhood over statehood has waned, BDS has grown ever angrier and ever less credible. This is too bad for Palestinia­ns, and too bad for the prospects for peace.

 ?? AP ?? MISGUIDED APPROACH: Despite their flag-waving, Palstinian­s have repeatedly turned down proposals for a Palestinia­n state,
AP MISGUIDED APPROACH: Despite their flag-waving, Palstinian­s have repeatedly turned down proposals for a Palestinia­n state,
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States